Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262394AbTIHOVV (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:21:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262420AbTIHOVU (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:21:20 -0400 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:42746 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262394AbTIHOVI (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:21:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:20:46 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Manfred Spraul Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peter_daum@t-online.de Subject: Re: [2.4 patch] fix CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT Message-ID: <20030908142046.GA28062@fs.tum.de> References: <3F5B96C3.1060706@colorfullife.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F5B96C3.1060706@colorfullife.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 989 Lines: 32 On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:36:19PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > Adrian wrote: > > >With CONFIG_M686 CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT was set to 5, but a Pentium 4 > >requires 7. > > > > > Why requires? On x86, the cpu caches are fully coherent. A too small L1 > cache shift results in false sharing on SMP, but it shouldn't cause the > described problems. >... Thanks for the correction, I falsely thought CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT does something different than it does. > Manfred cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/