Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:53:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:52:59 -0500 Received: from dfw-smtpout4.email.verio.net ([129.250.36.44]:58276 "EHLO dfw-smtpout4.email.verio.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:52:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3AB67F7C.34E093F8@bigfoot.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:51:56 -0800 From: Tim Moore Organization: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19pre17 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: UDMA 100 / PIIX4 question In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Hahn wrote: > > > > > I have an IBM DTLA 307030 (ATA 100 / UDMA 5) on an 815e board (Asus CUSL2), which has a PIIX4 controller. > > > > ... > > > > My problem is that (according to hdparm -t), I never get a better transfer rate than approximately 15.8 Mb/sec.... > > > > > > 15MB/s for hdparm is about right. > > it's definitely not right: this disk sustains around 35 MB/s. The 815e does not use a PIIX4 chipset. My references were to PIIX4 chipsets. > nonsequitur: the controller and disk are both quite capable of > sustaining 20-35 MB/s (depending on zone.) here's hdparm output > for a disk of the same rpm and density as the DTLA's: > > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.07 seconds =119.63 MB/sec > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.02 seconds = 31.68 MB/sec > > (maxtor dm+45, hpt366 controller) > regards, mark hahn. Again, this is not a PIIX4 chipset. rgds, tim. -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/