Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp3645684imm; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:28:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLbPEclJdHeIn2+I83JQ6ahJAIXPUZ+fQdRDPbiTh8zBTF/PsMuJ3WVFvojfTnw3zpP2W0J X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:201:: with SMTP id 1-v6mr7451769plc.310.1529310518587; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:28:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1529310518; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Jwyf0voXh6K8FagimEGX/agtpQJi+jvjTz1vpJzxg6V2m0RxRl6W8Dd6mEqDsot/Y7 ECYd0yEzsqIZuXBfk14y0kF0ZpOR4s/Spp+VHu2JKk9Ycf24mZHvs8fH4cZMH/6ULwm3 bFs/9XJTxYbCub/MwAG3KZROVvEBky8SSukZm68VaSxdnD3pFhK++KO84krPybDONIqR pr0+GYfst8FfrnsBL5ZMhakDZzPNg4k1nZVWyepYpBxrEbsiNB6couFZ0etaljP+JWMh lIrNN6QgEnAFWpgVEDFSZQfaSMXWk+XQfODQTLZ7IxMSscXvba3rAsIbZ01KeJZKQ4PO cI6A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=EA38PbAYuMNdqXkJZkIKercjtjJqVqhKkcKESuQ+OXQ=; b=Oz8ORns7Wryg8OOVbncCBH8SpwDrZvQ4g252B2I7K0jtdCe1FRf851kZj2qpclVdkJ sDc1a2egLq0x/poneIAyXezMYe3XaixvJN6LDxUF6Kbje3V2j5969kTCgVu6zHKP+/gh aoWoooCWRPjOeDsI6dXQXKsgt2OCKqXYT7ziPEqzq75q6GgRu+mMp4BtLCf3U7NCR41D 3o2NqvHLAALpLP49M59MioNqjpLBCmmxtT+K5MajSTP6zJce/1S4nXNdWMrskNqr5KLx IgCrkl4jIWlS3GJaMolhEVd1yL7WWxi+8DIk+KMPKudqaIghF+vAjAuGMXp/05OuYJ8z UdXg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e7-v6si11721458pgf.317.2018.06.18.01.28.25; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966184AbeFRI0c (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 Jun 2018 04:26:32 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:57348 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966131AbeFRI02 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2018 04:26:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02413C8D; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:26:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Linus Torvalds , Michael Ellermen , Peter Zijlstra , Ram Pai , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.16 237/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:13:42 +0200 Message-Id: <20180618080618.608268254@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20180618080608.851973560@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180618080608.851973560@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dave Hansen [ Upstream commit 55556b0b2016806b2e16a20b62d143383983a34a ] do_not_expect_pk_fault() is a helper that we call when we do not expect a PK fault to have occurred. But, it is a function, which means that it obscures the line numbers from pkey_assert(). It also gives no details. Replace it with an implementation that gives nice line numbers and also lets callers pass in a more descriptive message about what happened that caused the unexpected fault. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Ellermen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171338.55D13B64@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c @@ -954,10 +954,11 @@ void expected_pk_fault(int pkey) last_si_pkey = -1; } -void do_not_expect_pk_fault(void) -{ - pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults); -} +#define do_not_expect_pk_fault(msg) do { \ + if (last_pkru_faults != pkru_faults) \ + dprintf0("unexpected PK fault: %s\n", msg); \ + pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults); \ +} while (0) int test_fds[10] = { -1 }; int nr_test_fds; @@ -1243,7 +1244,7 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16 pkey_assert(ret != -1); /* Now access from the current task, and expect NO exception: */ peek_result = read_ptr(plain_ptr); - do_not_expect_pk_fault(); + do_not_expect_pk_fault("read plain pointer after ptrace"); ret = ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, child_pid, ignored, 0); pkey_assert(ret != -1); @@ -1287,7 +1288,7 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory */ madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED); lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch); - do_not_expect_pk_fault(); + do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory"); ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1); dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents); expected_pk_fault(pkey);