Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263247AbTIHRJF (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:09:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263320AbTIHRJF (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:09:05 -0400 Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:38799 "EHLO mail.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263247AbTIHRJC (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:09:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:07:51 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Manfred Spraul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peter_daum@t-online.de Subject: Re: [2.4 patch] fix CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT Message-ID: <20030908170751.GB27097@mail.jlokier.co.uk> References: <3F5B96C3.1060706@colorfullife.com> <20030908142046.GA28062@fs.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030908142046.GA28062@fs.tum.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 770 Lines: 23 Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Why requires? On x86, the cpu caches are fully coherent. A too small L1 > > cache shift results in false sharing on SMP, but it shouldn't cause the > > described problems. > >... > > Thanks for the correction, I falsely thought CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT > does something different than it does. Were there any changes in the kernel to do with PCI MWI settings? (MWI == memory write and invalidate) If MWI is set incorrectly, I think PCI DMA is capable of breaking x86 cache coherence. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/