Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S131648AbRCSWkS>; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:40:18 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S131649AbRCSWkI>; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:40:08 -0500
Received: from relay03.cablecom.net ([62.2.33.103]:43783 "EHLO
	relay03.cablecom.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S131648AbRCSWkD>; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:40:03 -0500
Message-ID: <3AB68A91.9785A9D0@bluewin.ch>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:39:13 +0100
From: Otto Wyss <otto.wyss@bluewin.ch>
Reply-To: otto.wyss@bluewin.ch
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: de,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux should better cope with power failure
In-Reply-To: <3FA68C00B3E3A3418373DA6446330DD30328E0@spike.i405.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

"Stephen Gutknecht (linux-kernel)" wrote:
> 
> Otto,
> 
[...]
> Have you considered telnet into your box from a second machine?  Even a 486
> system would do this fine... network cards are cheap.  You could try to
> recover the system or at least do a shutdown.
> 
It was just a simple test machine where it didn't matter what was lost.
Still that doesn't justify this behaviour.

O. Wyss
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/