Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263706AbTIHW1q (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:27:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263697AbTIHW1p (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:27:45 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:7623 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262942AbTIHW1a (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:27:30 -0400 Subject: Re: Plans for better performance metrics in upcoming kernels? From: Craig Thomas To: scott_list@mischko.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200309080754.55700.scott_list@mischko.com> References: <200309051641.44228.scott_list@mischko.com> <200309080754.55700.scott_list@mischko.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1063060034.16303.23.camel@bullpen.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 08 Sep 2003 15:27:14 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1865 Lines: 57 We have a project to maintain and improve systat here at OSDL. We're looking for others to help in this area, if your're interested. On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 07:54, Scott Chapman wrote: > Hi all, > > I received one reply to this email. I take it there is nobody really heading > up the implementation of improved/missing performance metrics in the kernel? > > Is this on anyone's radar? > > What is Linus' take on more/better metrics? > Is he likely to roll them in if they are implemented? > > Is there any plan to implement any existing patches? > > If I can get developer time applied to this project, I don't want to re-invent > the existing pieces. Who do I coordinate with? > > Cordially, > Scott > > On Friday 05 September 2003 16:41, Scott Chapman wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm wondering what the plans are for more accurate and more useful > > performance metrics in upcoming kernels. > > > > CPU Utilization by process is apparently a known-inaccuracy. > > > > There are no disk I/O metrics per process. > > > > CPU Queue Length doesn't appear to be available? > > > > Etc. > > > > Linux clearly falls behind the competition in this area. It makes it rather > > tough to do system performance analysis on a Linux box! :-) > > > > Is there a plan to deal with these issues? ETA's? > > > > Cordially, > > Scott > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Craig Thomas craiger@osdl.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/