Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263767AbTIHWvd (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:51:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263768AbTIHWvd (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:51:33 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:3543 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263767AbTIHWva (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:51:30 -0400 Message-Id: <200309082251.h88MpRX30963@mail.osdl.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: scott_list@mischko.com cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Plans for better performance metrics in upcoming kernels? In-Reply-To: Message from Craig Thomas of "08 Sep 2003 15:27:14 PDT." <1063060034.16303.23.camel@bullpen.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 15:51:27 -0700 From: Cliff White Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2448 Lines: 71 > We have a project to maintain and improve systat here at OSDL. We're > looking for others to help in this area, if your're interested. > > On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 07:54, Scott Chapman wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I received one reply to this email. I take it there is nobody really heading > > up the implementation of improved/missing performance metrics in the kernel? > > > > Is this on anyone's radar? > > > > What is Linus' take on more/better metrics? > > Is he likely to roll them in if they are implemented? > > > > Is there any plan to implement any existing patches? > > > > If I can get developer time applied to this project, I don't want to re-invent > > the existing pieces. Who do I coordinate with? OSDL can also provide you hardware resources, if you want to do a project. We may be able to help some with the coordination, if bandwidth allows. OSDL is definately interested in improving performance metrics. cliffw > > > > Cordially, > > Scott > > > > On Friday 05 September 2003 16:41, Scott Chapman wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I'm wondering what the plans are for more accurate and more useful > > > performance metrics in upcoming kernels. > > > > > > CPU Utilization by process is apparently a known-inaccuracy. > > > > > > There are no disk I/O metrics per process. > > > > > > CPU Queue Length doesn't appear to be available? > > > > > > Etc. > > > > > > Linux clearly falls behind the competition in this area. It makes it rather > > > tough to do system performance analysis on a Linux box! :-) > > > > > > Is there a plan to deal with these issues? ETA's? > > > > > > Cordially, > > > Scott > > > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- > Craig Thomas > craiger@osdl.org > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/