Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp4850478imm; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:32:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLG0ZrkS0bF6MhN5KLn2/hfeqzXDQYtZxCGLMPOY1r5tJTjlPurR1oQ28LVcxsBs3dHuRrC X-Received: by 2002:a62:d09:: with SMTP id v9-v6mr16683287pfi.163.1529393528085; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:32:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1529393528; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SQgDXlq+/Vxx99zf4nZG3vN6+QltGY7KtwflXDz7UGC6CGJ2tPcWHR03ttDggXYSC8 fKh+Y5+dHk7JS5/NPeqxsmznJ3zRQ8F4TMkxLRAEdHLB++Uf3Ex787hOF+sj6CTxKqvS 1QlIZpvW6ewn24/w54DtaGyrO/kUx6/6MMCQ4+yvOv2wNDsEu0M5MK8CLn1ePqu49+tT qVkYAKtjqT7sS/Q5zIbiLM09lk/MxfEkxrk/MOm1AB6FIemfijW335VIu2yTtTF68zNE izRgXeiKe3kdrNZVD9P+thiW3PHcYmW0HsGw2NVqJQbAbZZXVQ5s88a8PR+um3sMUGpy 368A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=i3nA5XfMpvLeaTLcn03ISzJGduCGaoI+gJkp3sLaeBw=; b=ScGqHResjSVFs8YsCoL6Ot75xMgHoqF+CeJC7BO1ZH6dbR3G2swebMpeCsGFSKa/PD AcUAipazGSA1o4VBhBf1HqI5dlJKsH0DrZSHH2E4I5v+p5fH2rtdLjNWYkzMjS1mwiev rocuUgnLv9dImBNivptWkQ3udxxiEDcGn5Q6NtbaIPy9esEN2ZUxHvZzwra2NKp2p+g3 Rj+nSTuxgzMax+E0A634BZR476f6ZkUmMuuOpqkY5n4DM37u7IgT2A4jFRuWz4cv3EJL zU/3WVx1DFDo/dOIRNd+4Bys2SuNh2ZZfpX82ZiCNSboaCQZUjIby8YmgR64IXgEyA8N QmUw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=t2xcfarI; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c7-v6si14224325pgt.220.2018.06.19.00.31.54; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=t2xcfarI; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756091AbeFSHbT (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 03:31:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pl0-f66.google.com ([209.85.160.66]:39114 "EHLO mail-pl0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755614AbeFSHbR (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 03:31:17 -0400 Received: by mail-pl0-f66.google.com with SMTP id f1-v6so10467689plt.6 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:31:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=i3nA5XfMpvLeaTLcn03ISzJGduCGaoI+gJkp3sLaeBw=; b=t2xcfarIbMls2ey7GpnVEBGGXytIDSX2bEXxApv657LUNm2oYpZL0dqWjdijLP7YcQ 4j5845/M+c3UxTdlgXlU6R5vBdovvP8E2RfCE1BxGOKZHiU0nYxh+Er6qEaQghC9WCus guPZVffC9QEeXG0gvwoWJrfBtMlzDYXh81wmDlR1FdzhQPqM7c2xhyOYRw+/cnQ5BZ6/ 8Fz6IfkrcKyjsQluI50q49YIsN16/CpW2ZtOO6269EpHO+hN5Jsb88eIsr2rg6ZZxVVQ gZGwliqJa7mktYRvqYyjBJV3ktZWAQcPPDBqf+hxo99/m0bf7MAb2LFHH7QyqUZza62K oBRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=i3nA5XfMpvLeaTLcn03ISzJGduCGaoI+gJkp3sLaeBw=; b=FmJyhRzpxIDE31ljN4nBUvdNd9JurWw56H31Usti6Lj30zXsHyCkcl90E2hI0/ysfN S/kg12hfRwM9tL4Kao8oAAqVL5lpfDvxuxMfcCv2wXjWQQtnyhWilk5Vz4NaT9WqriWA 1kAhK05SoeoaWOherHIaR/nawEpfix3PzOriFrrG6xGYe7xSdCz3h6zXlJf4Q8RMrVum Hmp9M/2pu2TQHWbtSBEqBEGOYajZKlprnEORAbbmSmBwkWEHDtV8sO+iLF6LNmT4ioRe 3FBrqLUQukCxPL+68N1Nb2J8BeaSoSD/pJKwJ/fMaAKgF1/kZHtobALtW2c14wNuEdRm H6eA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1OlrrIEWYHbXQ6C+X1lknwTh5+o/gfC7dpJtIjm11jFUZFmDCU yIGW9wO41yQNJm0HgXl5OdK15g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7e42:: with SMTP id a2-v6mr17472806pln.151.1529393476983; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:0:1000:1600:3122:ea9c:d178:eb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w7-v6sm19612565pgs.68.2018.06.19.00.31.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:31:15 -0700 From: Joel Fernandes To: Joel Fernandes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Josh Triplett , Lai Jiangshan , Mathieu Desnoyers , "Paul E. McKenney" , Steven Rostedt , Byungchul Park Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rcutorture: Fix rcu_barrier successes counter Message-ID: <20180619073115.GA241700@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <20180619062215.221564-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20180619062215.221564-2-joel@joelfernandes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180619062215.221564-2-joel@joelfernandes.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:22:15PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: > From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" > > rcutorture currently increments both successes and error counters for > the rcu_barrier test incase of errors. It should only increment the > error counter incase of errors so make it do so. > > Test: Introduced rcu_barrier errors by returning from the barrier > callback without incrementing the callback counter. Hi Paul, Think some more about this counter, I think you mean 'successes' as in 'successful attempts' than 'successful test' ? If so, then perhaps you can drop this patch. It wasn't clear to me what the 'successes' meant so I may have been a bit misled into changing its meaning. If on the other hand, it means 'successful test', then yes this patch would be Ok then. thanks! -Joel