Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180619142421.GA16151@infradead.org>
References: <20180529144339.16538-1-mszeredi@redhat.com> <20180529144339.16538-8-mszeredi@redhat.com>
 <20180604084904.GF11333@infradead.org> <20180610045657.GM30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <CAJfpegtGtAR25qWgpNisvL8F51h3K6s44zkWBSVVbqecut6tBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180611162412.GA7574@infradead.org> <CAJfpegvxHs+MvC3N2Cbocp0UNrM47_GEUSV+mAx=8VVNDz7r_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180619142421.GA16151@infradead.org>
From:   Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:34:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJfpegt7QYa1SD=uJ84RE9qLbJLMCW+viV=FN_TJJjCK4BERLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/39] vfs: export vfs_ioctl() to modules
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
        overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 04:04:41PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> FS_IOC*
>>
>> Haven't looked deeply.  For now overlayfs just implements
>> FS_IOC_{GET|SET}FLAGS because some of these flags are quite generic
>> and implementing them on the overlay is easy.
>>
>> Yes, turning into a method makes sense.
>
> Do you want to do this or should I send a patch?

Do it.  You are much more familiar with regular fs that implement
these ioctls.  Untangling overlap between FS_IOC_...FLAGS and
FS_IOC_...XATTR looks "interesting".

Thanks,
Miklos