Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262204AbTIIGYh (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 02:24:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262378AbTIIGYh (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 02:24:37 -0400 Received: from mail12.speakeasy.net ([216.254.0.212]:57005 "EHLO mail.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262204AbTIIGYg (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 02:24:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:24:32 -0700 Message-Id: <200309090624.h896OWe21912@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Andrew Morton X-Fcc: ~/Mail/linus Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , mingo@redhat.com, drepper@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] use group_leader->pgrp (was Re: setpgid and threads) In-Reply-To: Andrew Morton's message of Monday, 8 September 2003 19:12:15 -0700 <20030908191215.22f501a2.akpm@osdl.org> X-Zippy-Says: I want another RE-WRITE on my CAESAR SALAD!! Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 598 Lines: 18 > Would it make sense to do this via > > if (is_orphaned_pgrp(process_group(current))) > > and to then rename task_struct.pgrp to something else, to pick up any > missed conversions? I am wholly in favor of this. I think what we really want to do is move pgrp into signal_struct, and that would be painless after the macroization. Thanks, Roland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/