Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:42:40 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc:     Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>,
        viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server.
Message-ID: <20180619204240.GA32604@1wt.eu>
References: <4C5F9B25.8080401@st.com>
 <20100809064957.GB16661@pengutronix.de>
 <4C5FA698.90904@st.com>
 <20100809090137.GP13165@mea-ext.zmailer.org>
 <1281348164.12908.47.camel@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1281348164.12908.47.camel@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:02:44AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> If my corporate overloads told me I had to use my Exchange "messaging"
> account for external email communication, they would get a quite clear
> 'no' in response. My response may also contain suggestions that they use
> certain other objects for purposes for which they were not designed.

I'd say that if, after having been calmly explained the nature of the
trouble caused, they don't care, it's a clear demonstration of total
lack of respect of your work by deliberately breaking the tools you
need to do it. Generally it's the signal that it's time to find a more
respectful employer.

Willy