Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:06:39 +0100
From:   Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com, steven.sistare@oracle.com,
        dhaval.giani@oracle.com, rohit.k.jain@oracle.com,
        umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, riel@surriel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] select_idle_sibling rework
Message-ID: <20180619220639.GA14960@codeblueprint.co.uk>
References: <20180530142236.667774973@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180530142236.667774973@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 30 May, at 04:22:36PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This is all still very preliminary and could all still go up in flames (it has
> only seen hackbench so far). This is mostly the same code I posted yesterday,
> but hopefully in a more readable form.
> 
> This fixes the SIS_PROP as per the outline here:
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180425153600.GA4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
> 
> and Rohit's suggestion of folding the iteration loops.
> 
> For testing I would suggest to ignore the last 3 patches, those are purely
> cleanups once the first lot is found to actually work as advertised.

This series looks pretty good from my testing. I see double-digit
improvements to hackbench results and only one case of a clear
regression (easily offset by all the wins).

Are you aware of any regressions for particular benchmarks I should
take a look at?