Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp579558imm; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 03:17:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLwvnjVPfHpf4QxVZ+x9X5fhXL1+UPWMEK4kW6TmHcq1OCtmeQUSbVPfcvOmhgFulYYLpzU X-Received: by 2002:a62:8917:: with SMTP id v23-v6mr17849431pfd.127.1529489837533; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 03:17:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1529489837; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KRrXYwqT9W28oipKYjH4fGf663Wb8VcESIFqfl4BZVw3i+sI1B0x2Kxm87kqkblrFP lCcmrjzX7QVxqCrhdpsoASUVKndn31yfsaEd0ucTMRp09hws2+Tp8qrIes3biIUBcLhM KmsbkOCjHaDRftgiZwi8As1J4bJ5xoYhNydGZ8gLRquwLTsQzabyzFbGw3xne+HSk29X ZBUx//3JIP82oi0zO2anTTf1Yq6FlAfRBIIj9joiVur0stX7p7+XWEd8m/Iw2ioH/xi4 eaL2BZOV9FGQt0OffWaoeIU+K6V+QeXIWUmu/PpYJfrqkZ8UFxseAPSjNsZP9YCwx8eB GsVA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:arc-authentication-results; bh=VB8a07ueYTJznA6ifS9h/vwMhFw4a0OqBPP8USJUWRU=; b=YGQEuPIXaK+70qqIZ1mdlHhfpzF8ii6IO1yhcJ1cx6dyKoW9HPm26FagXgFcQDnAW3 s97TAW1+7m1QNTEAMv7Q6UtJ44gvwZWo4QbUKmq0gKjincVa63h2eccvQOre/m6vd4P4 k71rsl4lF/kPJHS+hUMLqejOJPctXYkxMy6IS0D2dmrV8ZbG5pGvg/72/K+zJCqvnEfk Gl11OEQWjCWGA/T1Rsy4zTvY3YEVL3/PKxA8qUsZcab9YDZ5GcIKVBFk7NYO/KvYIQpS yXxyMzHc+PJMrG3A7eml7kf4b+5966qIC06+ONS08jR2soh/hPQAO5/ev8OvW1wvWhpT Q5KQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f8-v6si1676368pgp.293.2018.06.20.03.17.03; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 03:17:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752871AbeFTKQX (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 06:16:23 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:55164 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750902AbeFTKQU (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 06:16:20 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jun 2018 03:16:20 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,246,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="60754641" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.72.86]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jun 2018 03:16:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] bitmap: Introduce alloc/free helpers From: Andy Shevchenko To: Yury Norov Cc: Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, Shaohua Li , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, Joe Perches Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:16:16 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20180620072721.GA19364@yury-thinkpad> References: <20180618131003.88110-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20180620072721.GA19364@yury-thinkpad> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.1-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 10:33 +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 04:09:58PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > External Email > > > > A lot of code is using allocation of bitmaps using BITS_PER_LONG() > > macro and > > sizeof(unsigned long) operator. The readability suffers because of > > this. > > > > The series introduces three helpers, i.e. bitmap_alloc(), > > bitmap_zalloc() and > > bitmap_free(), to make it more cleaner. > > tools/include/linux/bitmap.h already has bitmap_alloc(), TBH, I don't give a crap about tools. They invented something that might or might not follow kernel APIs. At the end, it's a user space. > and it corresponds to bitmap_zalloc() in this patch. It may > cause problems in future if people will copy functions that > use bitmap_alloc between kernel code and tools. So I think > we have to propagate this API to tools and update existing > users of bitmap_alloc() in tools. Propose a patch then. Perhaps I need to inform tools people about new API coming, but that's all what I can do. Existing something in tools/ does not and should not prevent extending / changing kernel internal APIs. > What about code that calls specific alloc functions, like > memblock_virt_alloc() and pcpu_mem_zalloc() in mm/percpu.c, What about it? It's not in scope of this API for sure. The above mentioned functions have a very limited area of usage. Your example also a bit complicated, since it's not allocating _just_ a bitmap, but a structure _with_ embedded bitmap. > or devm_kcalloc() in drivers/dma/edma.c? There is no such file in the tree. You perhaps referred to drivers/dma/ti/edma.c. Yes, this is a candidate to convert later on if anyone wants to do it (with introducing devm_bitmap_alloc() / devm_bitmap_zalloc() helpers). > If we are going to > unify bitmap allocations in kernel, we should think about > unification of that cases too. Should it be additional > flag or optional pointer to the exact allocator in > bitmap_{,z}alloc()? So, I prefer one step at a time. Especially taking into consideration the problems I have to solve now with those simplest helpers I proposed. > > Yury > > > Patch 1 is a preparatory to avoid namespace collisions between > > bitmap API and > > MD bitmap. No functional changes intended. > > > > Patch 2 is just orphaned from previous release cycle. > > > > Patch 3 introduces new helpers. > > > > Patches 4 and 5 is just an example how to use new helpers. Locally I > > have like > > dozen of them against different subsystems and drivers. > > > > Ideally it would go through Input subsystem, thus, needs an Ack from > > MD maintainer(s). > > > > Since v2: > > - fix compilation issue in MD bitmap code > > - elaborate changes in commit message of patch 5 > > > > Since v1: > > - added namespace fix patch against MD bitmap API > > - moved functions to lib/bitmap.c to avoid circular dependencies > > - appended Dmitry's tags > > > > Andy Shevchenko (5): > > md: Avoid namespace collision with bitmap API > > bitmap: Drop unnecessary 0 check for u32 array operations > > bitmap: Add bitmap_alloc(), bitmap_zalloc() and bitmap_free() > > Input: gpio-keys - Switch to bitmap_zalloc() > > Input: evdev - Switch to bitmap API > > > > drivers/input/evdev.c | 16 +- > > drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c | 8 +- > > drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 6 +- > > drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 301 +++++++++---- > > ----- > > drivers/md/md-bitmap.h | 46 +-- > > drivers/md/md-cluster.c | 16 +- > > drivers/md/md.c | 44 +-- > > .../md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c | 12 +- > > drivers/md/raid1.c | 20 +- > > drivers/md/raid10.c | 26 +- > > drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 2 +- > > drivers/md/raid5.c | 24 +- > > include/linux/bitmap.h | 8 + > > lib/bitmap.c | 28 +- > > 14 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 274 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.17.1 -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy