Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:51:38 +0900
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     "Kohli, Gaurav" <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.16 161/279] kthread, sched/wait: Fix kthread_parkme()
 completion issue
Message-ID: <20180620185138.GD32326@kroah.com>
References: <20180618080608.851973560@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20180618080615.492002239@linuxfoundation.org>
 <7ef9ee41-877b-0cc3-bd2d-f495b1d354bb@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7ef9ee41-877b-0cc3-bd2d-f495b1d354bb@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:10:31PM +0530, Kohli, Gaurav wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> As more patches related to this are coming in 4.17, so it is better if all
> go together on different branches, plz suggest.

I do not understand, sorry.  What is wrong with this as-is?  If I need
to take other patches as well, please let me know what commits and what
stable tree(s) they belong on.

thanks,

greg k-h