Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp1354079imm; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:42:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIQVVFo43dbqQFvnHDJNGbWyyFyn0WQBDpZwt0zPVcZc9qD/7PahLbqjfksYll7Ld7+R3bU X-Received: by 2002:a63:9311:: with SMTP id b17-v6mr227758pge.261.1529538122862; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:42:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1529538122; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LmVXczJ6RPKSNHd7BTUDfU5j1LuQ16GqiFfEaaexG/i26v4tq3YT5i7ey+TupMrYmh ttzUyMaFfrj55TybTN5DgR/VyUTJKGcE5ioi0OUHcd8Xe77HQSqJTj5a21BqD1ryOUUH na7B2SjD3IRHyYDgZqUmX8tHc1f73i9X0qxn6C5tMsnmkQMRu5wkVubd32uVyEPwv4TZ ZVEBXgR6PqEllcYqh1ntlArRKNtIrkvF/okdYJseDq8DM66yR81sWu2iA3E4iIROn04D I0kmHsgTourXv5MWkYkFRZxXXxPQ/OJa0WMZzQZSqEC714Co1KV+sxbUr0hRy6dfwfXQ CBIg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=sBu7Ebf4sjnNOBuCZ4IAv5e6w/dU1nCIwd7epmp5m3Y=; b=pb3D9tR0jF7kKyT9eT9/gdfzYFw+unx7zb7hSMfy//qVq9oTk0sb8ROtmxSJfetP7M swAvclRq9PG4mZIrQ1DrBvigODmoHWoObOdQyqh626osgXMXlb4JUhsDxAtHFmmHE9IS dlr4e4iiOw3n797zt3simuFM7DbYLDsjnXmU8MUbVvd+9jqv7dJKAvXY2s4lZ13RxKAz 07/UAc6LOZzPZaIhG+UssIGyfY/1Gz392mYY+1hOWL7HA4FeUGygHKt8veGJcebqd7R0 KWDLnGzoMCzCNy9jWJGDTw2hoqIzt8mumjKLs3/iyBspIkfeXjXacAImDKhHpwkafyTI GQzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Pq4zhwAb; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c13-v6si3479154plo.97.2018.06.20.16.41.49; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Pq4zhwAb; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933134AbeFTXkh (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:40:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:38958 "EHLO mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932601AbeFTXke (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:40:34 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f195.google.com with SMTP id r11-v6so546716pfl.6; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:40:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sBu7Ebf4sjnNOBuCZ4IAv5e6w/dU1nCIwd7epmp5m3Y=; b=Pq4zhwAbeyeV+ZPoddLV8zGkHKp/jPRAWWayuU0N7WEH5SwvHUxQMOmuQgeJjpQI0i 5WUe/DVTU2UZ79qfyB9vCJ5cwagIjVXwMGoeJlFIsiQMznKPrASGXZzdrEDpdT3c4pec d/7KFK7OxC1nvCuqRUUXW4hdPLQESYkuf/H4BLyXIvN+HQjV8j2DHeBI9qOWvJv1JmWm YHiiJ1Mz4vVK4b/HyQMyNEIgZQeADADjAQbNuW2VJzJT7eykfyT6bCTxAESzm+8gGi03 JEbJ80oIN1UH+C9lSokwgxhXX30/W9NO8QoFrz11nt5e2J/DseFp/R0vf9Je8nPa2h3F gX9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sBu7Ebf4sjnNOBuCZ4IAv5e6w/dU1nCIwd7epmp5m3Y=; b=aU2cYqaDonl2yehFHBcDjm9/RZ3NuwImpYlkwMp6B7IQB+oDIRhh5/Jv89NZump/wb zN9tuztWEm1m4DtRXoYy+mPIVGZflQLk2b4eZQjWFTvc4i7zMuL6oGu7pQnM44f1hW4P BL9ONHpkSUXB/pBVrpUypO7vJm3rwDhwWDrDQger7tYd65hx9cTBc0xZQ9FuQ4sUGdy4 5es9tqOTxjj0U3JyblIoEzFHjkYVQJ4lxF4LweW8BwW0RMCdB9ZVi4LxAccvAm59qDae YxaUIgZIfWKeU5M1WJdD/sxFcR30gpfGLr17TOq06VhgDrZQJV44YfU/ELRO1yZ2AW/g GGqg== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2G/Ca+N2FdTCkO0J8WrAJLQTtZkNzTTjBrgV8shoq4scgIB0CI qX3P+NprFpmc3hF9awsIz7w= X-Received: by 2002:a65:4241:: with SMTP id d1-v6mr19995297pgq.392.1529538034105; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:40:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com ([2620:15c:17:3:dc28:5c82:b905:e8a8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v26-v6sm4838619pfe.13.2018.06.20.16.40.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:40:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:40:31 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Kees Cook Cc: Herbert Xu , Giovanni Cabiddu , Arnd Bergmann , Eric Biggers , Mike Snitzer , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , qat-linux@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Lars Persson , Tim Chen , "David S. Miller" , Alasdair Kergon , Rabin Vincent Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 05/11] crypto alg: Introduce max blocksize and alignmask Message-ID: <20180620234031.GC111712@gmail.com> References: <20180620190408.45104-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20180620190408.45104-6-keescook@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180620190408.45104-6-keescook@chromium.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10+28 (db52f11e) (2018-06-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:04:02PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this > exposes the existing upper bound on crypto block sizes for VLA removal, > and introduces a new check for alignmask (current maximum in the kernel > is 63 from manual inspection of all cra_alignmask settings). > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > --- > crypto/algapi.c | 5 ++++- > include/linux/crypto.h | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/crypto/algapi.c b/crypto/algapi.c > index c0755cf4f53f..760a412b059c 100644 > --- a/crypto/algapi.c > +++ b/crypto/algapi.c > @@ -57,7 +57,10 @@ static int crypto_check_alg(struct crypto_alg *alg) > if (alg->cra_alignmask & (alg->cra_alignmask + 1)) > return -EINVAL; > > - if (alg->cra_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE / 8) > + if (alg->cra_blocksize > CRYPTO_ALG_MAX_BLOCKSIZE) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (alg->cra_alignmask > CRYPTO_ALG_MAX_ALIGNMASK) > return -EINVAL; > > if (!alg->cra_type && (alg->cra_flags & CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_MASK) == > diff --git a/include/linux/crypto.h b/include/linux/crypto.h > index 6eb06101089f..e76ffcbd5aa6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/crypto.h > +++ b/include/linux/crypto.h > @@ -134,6 +134,10 @@ > */ > #define CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME 128 > > +/* Maximum values for registered algorithms. */ > +#define CRYPTO_ALG_MAX_BLOCKSIZE (PAGE_SIZE / 8) > +#define CRYPTO_ALG_MAX_ALIGNMASK 63 > + How do these differ from MAX_CIPHER_BLOCKSIZE and MAX_CIPHER_ALIGNMASK, and why are they declared in different places? - Eric