Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 21:21:07 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-2?B?R+Fib3IgTOlu4XJ0?= <lgb@lgb.hu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: precise characterization of ext3 atomicity
Message-ID: <20030909192107.GB22952@vega.digitel2002.hu>
Reply-To: lgb@lgb.hu
References: <3F574A49.7040900@namesys.com> <20030904085537.78c251b3.akpm@osdl.org> <3F576176.3010202@namesys.com> <20030904091256.1dca14a5.akpm@osdl.org> <3F57676E.7010804@namesys.com> <20030904181540.GC13676@matchmail.com> <3F578656.60005@namesys.com> <20030904132804.D15623@schatzie.adilger.int> <3F57AF79.1040702@namesys.com> <20030909130902.GE3944@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20030909130902.GE3944@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 827
Lines: 19

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:09:02PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Yup.  That's why we confine it to a (finite #defined number) set of 
> > operations within one sys_reiser4 call.  At some point we will allow 
> > trusted user space processes to span multiple system calls (mail 
> > server applicances, database appliances, etc., might find this 
> > useful).  You might consider supporting sys_reiser4 at some point.
> 
> 
> Well, if you want that API to be widely usable, you should invent
> better name than sys_reiser4 :-).

Like ActiveFSControll or such? ;-)

- G?bor (larta'H)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/