Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:26:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:26:37 -0500 Received: from tallinn.sydamekirurgia.ee ([193.40.6.9]:1553 "EHLO ns.linking.ee") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:26:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 05:55:30 +0200 (EET) From: Elmer Joandi To: Petr Vandrovec cc: Subject: Re: atyfb,matrox hardlocks, multihead, USB broken, 2.4.2-ac8 In-Reply-To: <3AB695DE.84A933D@vc.cvut.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Got it to work somewhat... that was real long f*** the only sequence - no dga, kernel boots and BIOS uses Matrox PCI as first graphics via matrox start up two ATI cards(one AGP, one PCI)(xinerama mode, screwed output ) with Xserver hacked to read /dev/input/event* ant talking direct to ATI. now insert matroxfb_base now start two normal XFree86 on framebuffer /dev/fb0 and /dev/fb1, i.e. matroxes, xinerama keyboard from system console... log into matroxes ATI dualscreen picture clears itself by magic spell and becomes usable. everything works... until ATI exits, then there is kernel hardlock. Weird that all locks are hardlocks - no ping no sysreq... SMP here. ah - message from matrox framebuffer - complaining no irq A assigned to slot, and suggesting that BIOS is buggy. Will I be more happy when using a dualhead matrox AGP instead of AGP+PCI ATI pair ? 2.4.0 kernel, 2.4.2-ac8 USB looks like very very broken. elmer. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/