Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the
 reset framework
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
References: <20180621073706.22812-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Message-ID: <9ec10627-49a5-07ad-8c9d-5ac873096cc0@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:22:24 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180621073706.22812-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Bartosz,

On Thursday 21 June 2018 01:07 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> 
> These are the remaining patches that still need to be merged in order
> to complete the conversion of the davinci dsp driver to using the reset
> framework.
> 
> They apply on top of v4.18-rc1 with David Lechner's remaining patches
> merged.

Series looks good to me.

To preserve bisect, shouldn't the order of applying be patch #3, #4, #1
and #2 ?

Given the dependencies and to preserve bisect its easiest if I take the
series with acks from remoteproc and clock maintainers.

Open to other suggestions as well.

Thanks,
Sekhar