Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp2146264imm; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:55:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIfkHhQbEXUhZI0I5Lk8s4fgMXn6e4n8U+ib4983hQYcCQTICl7I6Gsx4X0gdjxYNwf4UsJ X-Received: by 2002:a65:4a51:: with SMTP id a17-v6mr22935573pgu.168.1529592901856; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:55:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1529592901; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HodrgOs+baHmT3CXeLlds82ZLLJT3aSzxz1dOLde7Y3MZ6bH/FA2o21HeIg7wm+Sw/ 4PRvkVxKqbDQ5lJb6ztCBRP1rznFXqsTPLa6+bzWQseh131Wj+41nJADE2ecOq+9v7O/ d+u4QE/4Ld6Qxf99idFaHfWkmmSahKUq3FrzeMcB1M+oiVMH8yVg4sLif1n+3V+QmetX fxhjWLjet3AlJW9PuG8emn+AKY0NgHIfdSlZoxzieuOr5cL6RsAwr8idVlOdx1yU1ouk JFQOicuWzfANkPWRFmpVE7+7B0tq5W5Rx3wFXB3vXDe5ZBqa/kVCjAa8U/n8bviYMlsJ zDTA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=rgDQafrKUYAP0fxI9mlpi6AOTEHHC5o9cEyC2DMImrw=; b=ZyAzbHDiQkPFpxlVKLfo4ObQ9glu8kpDcUg23PO0bu+eoDU7Qyx6irmpN+3vVlk4Oc O3JAO2FaF/tVNZkmbuLqGNlfr/Ca/tCpEimOsgdGN7NWwG3bFxM5W5XaoOg4/NhK2rxS 5eNQKmvS821iipP+IZW1tprRat4cjX8YdZnt14FokmqJkUvBokFdBzxaO0om1jjFUbiE ePP2zNX/UHravSFSBPYERZJcXdhi7noAkMgSa9jv4uF8SlYDjmfrpCh8A6I+8Al1YEPa hu5DmZ9tTnvM38phmdUlrrkhCBmFStVa541DTghbwtbZkDpvSbKWCUhylHnwKaEJu/az 10lg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mtTW49AP; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b3-v6si4132655pgr.495.2018.06.21.07.54.24; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mtTW49AP; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933018AbeFUOxY (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:53:24 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f67.google.com ([209.85.215.67]:44307 "EHLO mail-lf0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932752AbeFUOxX (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:53:23 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f67.google.com with SMTP id p23-v6so4781683lfh.11; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:53:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=rgDQafrKUYAP0fxI9mlpi6AOTEHHC5o9cEyC2DMImrw=; b=mtTW49APxKeBnKnR5xXUPP+LQSz4hmHbdINZ3PpaNWGDRE+4IUVXH/rhAoPkRJ8Ole S/XxhyuVM6LEICMHLbCyJXZHpbjs8okDAWmavu0YRfwurONeHlFaJ6KknIRR7sDISzKX i96P0+Eg+p+mhH+95HXn5EDwMsdqrzFylPYQeCzRLeHRixX37seF7xtkKWri1JeIDJwV 7SLCtArtRfOY18o8MneZNWNk65LyEUaupiz86s9yxEH/2Nbd/bJD5N7oSKwl9i7nrjgy +nfPWanrSPzvFZMzA323+E2dvc3YoRTuOdY+9AUmNJ9+K6lPmuRD/Zjs4efETzjvQCIi UUCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rgDQafrKUYAP0fxI9mlpi6AOTEHHC5o9cEyC2DMImrw=; b=eWKZTe20CcXwd7oJ4qSmmwp5nyXKAuQMIAmwqAwTS3+t+eLQVahVAx90Ne1dj8VWTO B+45Zc0nDgdJCg1ohv4HPF0XFckPemdbupiTzdh0mMXr32eiJX/x0z+r5epGUET+qFfn 3ZfkWPKOtYzeuwnIh3nKL1yvcPIVn8p+CIbR+/xg3lWWSobZt3k4eHGx5Ks9TaDcyM8R 9P5YjylOIDgg3DqVoRnMymWPulESGvxkzx4cL0Y9tdCoEMrfLCjWrceV/fkPFZOViaZy 2zAUPT8Y5Gn4E/qcymFXTNxYYYd14hNTkKsRvMuUt8m+BWUOZRLXzD+EuYOfTPe5omWP RMPA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1BBQ1STzyqaTHapWiI7/HW+w+jWMQiO3tZY2OsZdEdeqLGbFiB SoeV5nVEQCdWxn+3DLClCXKNToovgBCJsYSjXUk= X-Received: by 2002:a19:c203:: with SMTP id l3-v6mr8567638lfc.55.1529592801719; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:53:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a2e:56c8:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:53:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20180620155101.57685-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20180620155101.57685-2-arnd@arndb.de> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:53:20 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UjskST6bSNDrNxfq_hsE158R1nE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ceph: stop using current_kernel_time() To: "Yan, Zheng" Cc: Zheng Yan , Sage Weil , Ilya Dryomov , y2038 Mailman List , ceph-devel , Jeff Layton , Chengguang Xu , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:52 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> ceph_mdsc_create_request() is one of the last callers of the >> deprecated current_kernel_time() as well as timespec_trunc(). >> >> This changes it to use the timespec64 based interfaces instead, >> though we still need to convert the result until we are ready to >> change over req->r_stamp. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >> --- >> fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c >> index dc8bc664a871..69c839316a7a 100644 >> --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c >> +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c >> @@ -1779,6 +1779,7 @@ struct ceph_mds_request * >> ceph_mdsc_create_request(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc, int op, int mode) >> { >> struct ceph_mds_request *req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_NOFS); >> + struct timespec64 ts; >> >> if (!req) >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> @@ -1797,7 +1798,9 @@ ceph_mdsc_create_request(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc, int op, int mode) >> init_completion(&req->r_safe_completion); >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->r_unsafe_item); >> >> - req->r_stamp = timespec_trunc(current_kernel_time(), mdsc->fsc->sb->s_time_gran); >> + ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64(&ts); >> + req->r_stamp = timespec64_to_timespec(timespec64_trunc(ts, >> + mdsc->fsc->sb->s_time_gran)); >> > > does current_time() internally uses ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64()? If > not, granularity difference may cause problem. see commit > 56199016e8672feb7b903eda003a863d5bf2b8c4 for more information Yes, current_time() is based on current_kernel_time64(), which calls ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64(). I'm in the process of removing both current_kernel_time() and current_kernel_time64() in favor of ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64() for consistency. The resolution is unchanged here. Arnd