Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:38:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:37:48 -0500 Received: from platan.vc.cvut.cz ([147.32.240.81]:64525 "EHLO platan.vc.cvut.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:37:10 -0500 Message-ID: <3AB6D001.A9655498@vc.cvut.cz> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 04:35:29 +0100 From: Petr Vandrovec Organization: Czech Technical University - Computing and Information Centre X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: cs,cz,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elmer Joandi CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: atyfb,matrox hardlocks, multihead, USB broken, 2.4.2-ac8 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Elmer Joandi wrote: > ah - message from matrox framebuffer - complaining no irq A assigned to > slot, and suggesting that BIOS is buggy. Maybe you disabled it in BIOS? My BIOS has option 'assign irq to vga'... > Will I be more happy when using a dualhead matrox AGP instead of AGP+PCI > ATI pair ? It depends on how much heads you need. If you want more than one head and all heads need full acceleration, do not go to G400/G450. There is only one accelerator on them... (well, if you are using all displays together as one big workplace, you can try it; in that case it has benefit that both heads share same memory, so you can save some intersection operations). > 2.4.0 kernel, 2.4.2-ac8 USB looks like very very broken. USB worked for me until about 2.4.2-ac12 (VIA chipset). Petr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/