Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp2336031imm; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:46:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIzwoTqq40HAoU8+HE8+8tWyiNHnsFNX/bS5Oi2Cng43uSC6/iOrjP+0MRFsDHl5B6jtkXv X-Received: by 2002:a62:ab0e:: with SMTP id p14-v6mr28214239pff.211.1529603208997; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:46:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1529603208; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ahVfpfbnnGySVYYNxn6NA6dC/F8jdr7mW3L/4LWquVi+be+Yy95UKPzcfaG2rqINWh /T66MAuIId/Iw5op0v3nL1E9PTmtkgZk1Oixk9LHIe4skCsXLVPm35hfKEzOw+vFLk80 FqcIWikLD8Myg6XxBEDpnUoUZ3ZMksvA9oq1gJ9r2/1R1LIpSl4AHkO+Qb0pV5JY/au/ k10cu7MMlP4m4/z3jDmR1wK2Nm+i2zuQOe/xkedjpwGXto+87mqxJfskw7tjW4zMCWl8 2rsPrQxSswlXGhJoMeZ5ar/DVgS9E5P/PEP+Gyxkum4tuu2VXh97i/N6i/peQ0K302Ed IMgQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=LisTBStkh7fAe0gpBQ6eLhRaHV8VLlhHxHwWgviYAS4=; b=VcWMZ+3Ymfj4V2/0G2Mvq4MPBIS35P8iyPuzPWSzUQrVZch5FDvXcmRYYxf9F6MnQi CpGNi374dQpw+bxWeH58YOqAQuz/QneCtZaIcxD2TqOeDxAnjx4y4UnSe7NskDyQUrPB BRkbEMIzqO483Fh7kggS6opbbWx4EYC9w5NQ//azsn4vZlh3Y+A1fZCN+jthRJCrRsQy 2AGs6xE9ukYT3Nsg9oprBycrdosMcjakfC6hM2eHVzw45CUXSFxFentz7AtYExPiopbX Kvcb1PZ2sE9guWd0TNXDyu50z6RA1L7bz3v0lTn1jlbyUybdOTs35MBDLWTZUomUVncJ H7NA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o19-v6si4247720pgc.299.2018.06.21.10.46.34; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933164AbeFURpK (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:10 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:35322 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932844AbeFURpI (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:08 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w5LHYH7I048506 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:08 -0400 Received: from e14.ny.us.ibm.com (e14.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.204]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2jrfbf3fxm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:08 -0400 Received: from localhost by e14.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:07 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.27) by e14.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.201) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:04 -0400 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w5LHj3Lk17367532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:45:03 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072F511206B; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FFE112063; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:44:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sbct-3.pok.ibm.com (unknown [9.47.158.153]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:44:59 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] tpm: Implement tpm_chip_find() and tpm_chip_put() for other subsystems To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180620204236.1572523-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180620204236.1572523-2-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180621171518.GI11859@linux.intel.com> From: Stefan Berger Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:45:03 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180621171518.GI11859@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-MW X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18062117-0052-0000-0000-000003022D09 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009234; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000265; SDB=6.01050290; UDB=6.00538239; IPR=6.00829261; MB=3.00021788; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-06-21 17:45:06 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18062117-0053-0000-0000-00005D17F706 Message-Id: <95b2970f-b71b-4cfc-c188-7ae7e8cb94c5@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-06-21_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=960 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1805220000 definitions=main-1806210190 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/21/2018 01:15 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 04:42:33PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: >> Implement tpm_chip_find() for other subsystems to find a TPM chip and >> get a reference to that chip. Once done with using the chip, the reference >> is released using tpm_chip_put(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger > You should sort this out in a way that we don't end up with duplicate > functions. Do you want me to create a function *like* tpm_chip_find_get() that takes an additional parameter whether to get the ops semaphore and have that function called by the existing tpm_chip_find_get() and the new tpm_chip_find(). The latter would then not get the ops semphore. I didn't want to do this since one time the function returns with a lock held and the other time not.   Stefan > > /Jarkko >