Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264513AbTIIVhj (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:37:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264522AbTIIVhg (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:37:36 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:25815 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264513AbTIIVh0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:37:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:43:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrick Mochel X-X-Sender: mochel@cherise To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt cc: Jens Axboe , Pavel Machek , Linus Torvalds , kernel list Subject: Re: [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? In-Reply-To: <1063138756.642.48.camel@gaston> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1721 Lines: 49 > Patrick: As we discussed on IRC, the actual PM state constants you > defined don't match the old "S" levels, thus this code in ide-disk > suspend notifier: > > if (rq->pm->pm_state == 4) > > to avoid stopping the platter on suspend-to-disk will not work. > > Should I fix the above to use a PM_* constant or will you fix the > constants ? It should definitely be checking for a defined constant. However, I don't think we necessarily want to pass the system state we're entering to the drivers. It's per-driver policy to decide what device state to enter for each system state, which are orthogonal to the runtime device states that it could enter. For most devices, it's going to be 'off' (aka 3) for either suspend-to-ram or -disk. But, some devices will have varying or non-standard behavior. Like IDE drives or those few instances of ATI video devices on some power books that can only go into D2 instead of D3 on STR. To remedy this, I say we commit to the fact that it is the device state that's being passed down to the drivers. But, we get that state for each device from a field in the devices' power structures: struct dev_pm_info { ... u32 str_state; u32 std_state; }; The bus will be able to set these on device registration, or the driver on binding. We can also expose them through sysfs to let userspace policy modify them. Otherwise they will default to the standard (3 aka 'off'). What do you think? Pat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/