Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264832AbTIIWKn (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:10:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264833AbTIIWKn (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:10:43 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:9745 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264832AbTIIWKf (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:10:35 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: gatekeeper.tmr.com!davidsen From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen) Newsgroups: mail.linux-kernel Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test5: configcheck results Date: 9 Sep 2003 22:01:43 GMT Organization: TMR Associates, Schenectady NY Message-ID: References: <20030909100412.A25143@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Trace: gatekeeper.tmr.com 1063144903 17066 192.168.12.62 (9 Sep 2003 22:01:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@tmr.com Originator: davidsen@gatekeeper.tmr.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 982 Lines: 19 In article <20030909100412.A25143@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>, Russell King wrote: | I just ran make configcheck on 2.6.0-test5 and the results are: | | 832 files need linux/config.h but don't actually include it. | 689 files which include linux/config.h but don't require the header. I'm suspicious of the first one, unless you mean "include it with multi-level includes of other stuff." The second one is probably close to the truth. Thanks for doing this work, I'm not sure any tool is trustworthy, but it should be relatively easy to test the "do not need" files with a script. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/