Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264945AbTIIW4l (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:56:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264371AbTIIW4k (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:56:40 -0400 Received: from gprs149-34.eurotel.cz ([160.218.149.34]:2688 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264945AbTIIWy1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:54:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:54:10 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Patrick Mochel Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jens Axboe , Linus Torvalds , kernel list Subject: Re: [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Message-ID: <20030909225410.GD211@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1063138756.642.48.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2036 Lines: 54 Hi! > > Patrick: As we discussed on IRC, the actual PM state constants you > > defined don't match the old "S" levels, thus this code in ide-disk > > suspend notifier: > > > > if (rq->pm->pm_state == 4) > > > > to avoid stopping the platter on suspend-to-disk will not work. > > > > Should I fix the above to use a PM_* constant or will you fix the > > constants ? > > It should definitely be checking for a defined constant. > > However, I don't think we necessarily want to pass the system state we're > entering to the drivers. It's per-driver policy to decide what device > state to enter for each system state, which are orthogonal to the runtime > device states that it could enter. > > For most devices, it's going to be 'off' (aka 3) for either suspend-to-ram > or -disk. But, some devices will have varying or non-standard behavior. > Like IDE drives or those few instances of ATI video devices on some power > books that can only go into D2 instead of D3 on STR. > > To remedy this, I say we commit to the fact that it is the device state > that's being passed down to the drivers. But, we get that state for each > device from a field in the devices' power structures: > > > struct dev_pm_info { > ... > u32 str_state; > u32 std_state; > }; > > The bus will be able to set these on device registration, or the driver on > binding. We can also expose them through sysfs to let userspace policy > modify them. Otherwise they will default to the standard (3 aka 'off'). > > What do you think? I do think this is a bit complicated. I believe passing level, along with type of the suspend (aka swsusp vs. S4bios) should be enough. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/