Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp880089imm; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 06:54:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIOEKuAZwr8PKIhRodL3wpntZBz0e3KZWaABvFWwkDYY9y0SnijWUsVBE0+UTCrcktiKYrr X-Received: by 2002:a63:bd01:: with SMTP id a1-v6mr1503559pgf.319.1529675695752; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 06:54:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1529675695; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FjfcaFEeA/Wy3b3Fmf23Ftdhvp+cqnTO3I1ZtiIpDbm5iWrF1gv6XwtGPl6sCWHnhO YtCNvEkvMcsP+PAYWeYLK0nd8SJXuIY+Zrpgn9ZamEyoBER3/xFmtOhdtXVfGKOy/C5n HM0k6XxLERAuEDQsLp7dVMp9WDylmncdMlGduBMy8KJv/QyIkhET0RcqJ15hX3sK2rQ0 GkziAKHycEVtlk0Ndxt3GylZlyu2DttfFSb0UWXaqXdJPKwMGDTdyb8Ph/hx4OXqjJlX Glc4jpov210f6r434FPFaPOEdrXPdjfFKy/KYTdDlTprYpY4PPFo00zXExUR0SDKIy/R Q4Zw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dmarc-filter :dkim-signature:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=bzH6xl5mNjsJqG8EOoG0k0pDNUbyIauU3VWLMAZbbic=; b=mGvHvCUDZyVP+BhtSawwhYOcrfaPlL0BnsCczhBWqLBvYoW4zvcsEZM837hsbhxTsY aW8rYbU48cVGNsgSDKWEs7I+ajrBeQ8+dkCnh+fmakyQKybs4blSJ3ZZpOyp0IhNGsuH Wae/UBl3evaYzoMln74KJLgT+/ckwuyLw/OXp27G4QH1BK6EKt9jHtg0mCtrvt2ydMAo cmWRj5AzjA3uhkWDFPJkmmPE8/amBWBV4fFHTOJLfzsYI6ESh1EB6lVa1XmGANq0mAZk GiLAJNxW6PThL1vErGWrmYl3VkOLxMndMnjjfZBUY0rcLdcID96m68ACzjakS3nYDoe3 XMEA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b="ZPvoBQa/"; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=exOfqTd6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e62-v6si6401323pgc.37.2018.06.22.06.54.41; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 06:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b="ZPvoBQa/"; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=exOfqTd6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932819AbeFVNxC (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:53:02 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:59960 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751369AbeFVNxA (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:53:00 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 450456063F; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:53:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1529675580; bh=COHpKdPgSpx45S3AcK+J5oM3sHLC+5QVC3waiGZ9imY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZPvoBQa/p8v6MGluJHxzNrk9tm3ic97rXyEc9D2q6ArLPaGrbbR0aG893UbWLRuFV vBq8L0r9bGmLJJaaLoWLp87/PhZlCXiu12ztIPrTqGrNtlLBXRoYWjIHf/KqHKtw5b YlHZdK0+QyXxcxKwXk7HE8fPgX/V+kGAR8LgDfQ4= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from [192.168.0.117] (cpe-174-109-247-98.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.247.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: okaya@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59B3160264; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:52:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1529675579; bh=COHpKdPgSpx45S3AcK+J5oM3sHLC+5QVC3waiGZ9imY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=exOfqTd6OOkwF9DtmTid2FdxdwkU4fF9U6gk2dbYPql7O+wTnS2lCMYbN+HGd2e9B EKfGkzIxuCN3IL17zB2lBcuBrZIEbURyZmSOj1/5oyBufm9sZvfo3ywhpNySk3CjRR cj4CO4/IthTVlbTOiUKzhBAeK07EytKp4mjLFKSQ= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 59B3160264 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=okaya@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] efi/fb: Convert PCI bus address to resource if translated by the bridge To: Ard Biesheuvel , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: "open list:EFIFB FRAMEBUFFER DRIVER" , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi , open list , "open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" , Peter Jones , linux-arm-kernel References: <1526653072-7153-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1526653072-7153-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20180619222921.GA90490@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: <2a805337-c0b5-e134-7695-5a543ecaa26a@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:52:54 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ard, On 6/22/2018 7:21 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Apologies for only bringing this up now, but I think this patch is > wrong after all. > > screen_info.lfb_base is supposed to be a CPU address, and so > translating it like this is wrong. If you end up with a PCI address > here, you have made a mistake in hacking support for PCI outbound > translations into UEFI. Other users such as UEFI itself or GRUB will > treat this as a CPU physical address as well, so the kernel should not > treat it any differently. The behavior I'm seeing is from a UEFI BIOS vendor. I did not write the code for it... I was asked to debug it. I'd like to dive into your statement about UEFI and GRUB using this address as physical addresses. AFAIK, all PCI outbound requests go through PCI IO protocol in UEFI and the translation information is hidden inside the UEFI PCI Host Bridge driver. Drivers are not allowed to access PCI resources directly especially as a memory mapped address. This particular vendor is programming the BAR address into the GOP protocol. Since the host bridge driver is doing a translation, we are hitting this issue. Is there a UEFI spec reference about the definition of this field? Sinan -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.