Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: Finish the GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER conversion
Date:   Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:01:21 -0700
Message-Id: <20180622170126.6308-1-palmer@sifive.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180621181756.12493-1-palmer@sifive.com>
References: <20180621181756.12493-1-palmer@sifive.com>
Cc:     linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, jonas@southpole.se,
        stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, shorne@gmail.com,
        jason@lakedaemon.net, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org,
        vladimir.murzin@arm.com, keescook@chromium.org,
        jinb.park7@gmail.com, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
        alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        pombredanne@nexb.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, jhogan@kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
        james.morse@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
To:     tglx@linutronix.de
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com> wrote:
> A while ago I sent a patch set that adds a GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER,
> which is an exact copy of the existing IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support in the
> arm port, which is being used unconditionally by arm64 and openrisc.
> GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER is currently being used by the RISC-V port.  I
> managed to make a few mistakes in my original patch set and as a result
> my conversion of the other architectures of GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
> was dropped.
> 
> This patch set finishes up my original patch set by converting arm,
> arm64, and openrisc over to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support
> and then removing MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER as it's obselete.
> 
> At the time I wrote this I gave it fairly extensive build testing, but
> went I recently rebased it I just tested the full patch set on arm,
> arm64, and openrisc defconfigs.
> 
> Various flavors of this patch set have bounced around a few times
> before, but I'm calling this a whole new patch set as it builds on top
> of what was merged.

Looks like I managed to lose the patches.  They should be threaded under
this message...