Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264462AbTIJDnZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 23:43:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264468AbTIJDnZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 23:43:25 -0400 Received: from beta.galatali.com ([216.40.241.205]:5785 "EHLO beta.galatali.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264462AbTIJDnY (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 23:43:24 -0400 Subject: Why is the Compaq W8000 ACPI blacklisted? From: Tugrul Galatali To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1063165275.1806.16.camel@winnebago> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 23:42:39 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1004 Lines: 32 Since test4, I've had Compaq Workstation W8000 detected: force use of acpi=ht which leads to ACPI: Interpreter disabled. and that to annoying things like spinning down my IDE drive, which it isn't configured to do and doesn't happen in test3, and not powering off on shutdown. I see the entry doing this (./arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c:922) { force_acpi_ht, "Compaq Workstation W8000", { MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Compaq"), MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Workstation W8000"), NO_MATCH, NO_MATCH }}, introduced in test4. But why? Are there problems with more advanced features like sleep? acpi=force on test5 returns me to the functionality I had in test3. Tugrul Galatali - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/