Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 23 Jun 2018 22:11:36 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
cc:     steven.sistare@oracle.com, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com,
        linux@armlinux.org.uk, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, john.stultz@linaro.org,
        sboyd@codeaurora.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com,
        peterz@infradead.org, prarit@redhat.com, feng.tang@intel.com,
        pmladek@suse.com, gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 09/11] x86/tsc: prepare for early sched_clock
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806231815060.8650@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806232210110.8650@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <20180621212518.19914-1-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> <20180621212518.19914-10-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806231815060.8650@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 23 Jun 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > We will change sched_clock() to be called early.
> 
> Why is this relevant? Does the issue only appear with that change?

So you forgot to answer this question. I did not find a system yet, which
actually exposes this behaviour on mainline.

Is this an artifact of your early sched clock thing?

Thanks,

	tglx