Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261427AbTIJKX7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:23:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261473AbTIJKX7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:23:59 -0400 Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:50576 "EHLO mail.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261427AbTIJKX6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:23:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:23:46 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Hu, Boris" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Split futex global spinlock futex_lock Message-ID: <20030910102346.GB21313@mail.jlokier.co.uk> References: <37FBBA5F3A361C41AB7CE44558C3448E01C0B69E@pdsmsx403.ccr.corp.intel.com> <3F5EF0B9.7020207@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F5EF0B9.7020207@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 564 Lines: 14 Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Plus, currently we do not allocate locks so that the futexes fall in > different buckets. To some extend this is possible and would be a > possible optimization if this patch goes in. What do you mean? The futexes should be in different buckets already because of the hash function. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/