Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp3652984imm; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 02:14:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJXXQ3uTaeTmMQcfQmQslXdYxAEqsTLdtiY9O+Nt9e+MAYgGpjswUCeUfflAW/pBByHwj0T X-Received: by 2002:a65:4348:: with SMTP id k8-v6mr10078472pgq.341.1529918097739; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 02:14:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1529918097; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i+Hre2HOmjBCdI4m8yHxo3zaWuwCvVrC18iAVvwsZCdSAiePuXpNF+mmOwcAR9GLYk +HIGVcU51AFOFfb2ZUirdBRwhgHZ+gg+U+Dax0T61H90SrdlAoZ1ea8dy0XDXfvZjwpy MmgNnW1d3OIP/XbNddCkv7wFQqGmM5sN2bBBwYGVsfC1JupOwYOI0KditOi/RywF8M4Q 1AAcmRDQKYKlEotr+AfyqFL/CrbJvSDhL01MPf96WB3tyoaxssNbPvCvmf+qutpjzEnE /ztlNxCDRwlLNEVXik9TiPbCDdcLvoQvHbGNh25AYjSk1W/Uox/zR2RLclyf8rBHBsOF YXoQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=C1Bs/rx1Www+kNWnL/Onp31KrFxQ2dDxlENPR0LjWPk=; b=SmOKtEJ0l0cvhFqD8j5eOA7mUTMMetHNcLmtQtQmq7C3g1CD0BmZx0zPcPT4BUIF5K RHb0VW2DuBtdAXQLgUzKF12qH033pOJGE7FFyAEQXRuBg32Qc5UJA5093XSOcOoG3l/M X0Yeka+IFTnoPp2G7tMn3/TJ/+7tfeLOyAgkVmHblxj3pu545BviDsOYlqhz5vDeSo4W poxi+xdXV2I2JdqU/xVz/Go5ZD1bzKlqFox1PThlsXraRUIEN3lQxtaiEwCkGCndLYVL YzdgNjnZS91rgiNKKv1JDF7NaVaJOE0C8fpyfm4/fE+5+PDu0jCFueAOxBwh/L6XefUt rbKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o5-v6si11577488pgd.653.2018.06.25.02.14.43; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 02:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754838AbeFYJNU (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 05:13:20 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56297 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754449AbeFYJNS (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 05:13:18 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext-too.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CACFAB43; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:13:14 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tgraf@suug.ch, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, manfred@colorfullife.com, guillaume.knispel@supersonicimagine.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] lib/rhashtable: simplify bucket_table_alloc() Message-ID: <20180625091314.GG28965@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180621212825.3059-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20180621212825.3059-2-dave@stgolabs.net> <20180622181540.5gul4lx5dteqzzk3@linux-r8p5> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180622181540.5gul4lx5dteqzzk3@linux-r8p5> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 22-06-18 11:15:40, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > As of ce91f6ee5b3 (mm: kvmalloc does not fallback to vmalloc for incompatible gfp flag), > we can simplify the caller and trust kvzalloc() to just do the right thing. For the > case of the GFP_ATOMIC context, we can drop the __GFP_NORETRY flag for obvious reasons, > and for the __GFP_NOWARN case, however, it is changed such that the caller passes the > flag instead of making bucket_table_alloc() handle it. > > This slightly changes the gfp flags passed on to nested_table_alloc() as it will now > also use GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN. However, I consider this a positive consequence > as for the same reasons we want nowarn semantics in bucket_table_alloc(). > > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso Acked-by: Michal Hocko > --- > > v2: > - Changes based on Neil's concerns about keeping nowarn flag. > - Better changelog. > > > lib/rhashtable.c | 7 ++----- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/rhashtable.c b/lib/rhashtable.c > index 9427b5766134..083f871491a1 100644 > --- a/lib/rhashtable.c > +++ b/lib/rhashtable.c > @@ -175,10 +175,7 @@ static struct bucket_table *bucket_table_alloc(struct rhashtable *ht, > int i; > > size = sizeof(*tbl) + nbuckets * sizeof(tbl->buckets[0]); > - if (gfp != GFP_KERNEL) > - tbl = kzalloc(size, gfp | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY); > - else > - tbl = kvzalloc(size, gfp); > + tbl = kvzalloc(size, gfp); > > size = nbuckets; > > @@ -459,7 +456,7 @@ static int rhashtable_insert_rehash(struct rhashtable *ht, > > err = -ENOMEM; > > - new_tbl = bucket_table_alloc(ht, size, GFP_ATOMIC); > + new_tbl = bucket_table_alloc(ht, size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN); > if (new_tbl == NULL) > goto fail; > > -- > 2.16.4 -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs