Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp3746771imm; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 04:03:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKSoulpPuNxVYeOXVdiAR64OCScAVGNndrmfRgXlL7s4/WewMvoomhJR0sbLWyFMzCDYAs2 X-Received: by 2002:a62:c20e:: with SMTP id l14-v6mr12637127pfg.185.1529924613634; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 04:03:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1529924613; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bIOIJiV8DvZ53w2uRftuFYAu7NkJtefB9y/WKtg+fITMc4db9uyzO/YKhaeoaZJyAw gCweAqOUichQo/aBfA4uzf31BJBaMC26BC0Yex4n8fxY90IwO3np93KkCRYZ9XVXUl8M 1WNyNQzgrXMl7Cu797wiuKQNmYUX5sbCT3A7D6bU5ANTJWLVVDJHgZuzsRGWhSq+059c fCva+ay6P2CZIVqRSs8807Nbu6gLICHqN55c/cY4x744m+PxapEX5OfioAZzTNGM74m3 CLcxLQsvIz+zxVDN+kBEwrW0YtbKcxEKq8p/7xS3TiJCzfS+9bjfFA60bqxEM6GVhR9W STow== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=wvhRaxBW9DjuVsLADge+0tUcyXmjSNYeJgH0FMUOnJY=; b=o2t7VoU+UtEgt7sX3XoPuUyfdUfpo0cSY+nUVkmf2n97LfqOt9wijPXfdySlrfAy53 jFuIyA43jz7WvWwhDXzCVBHbzWg0gHOGQ100zDlstUzMs2rD6HpetueGOxMxdMlkdagG xevGLMQdkSELpMIOVk+ekhDlLbBZfy/UEz6ATynwvL7ts+EorapPBW7O8l0cNYNLr6ht ow9/Mo7Ee7Va4ojtw7bdTZoo64Gpu1efdihvgNiLfg2DnlqNbNzyQz8BpASYKHyG0RsR +3O9O6rsy2JuJJzEjHRS5ocy4b08HD4400LcQcAUrXWlz5bENaKI8aXKuNgjtkBKgNFI VwfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s184-v6si5856118pgs.492.2018.06.25.04.03.19; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 04:03:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932221AbeFYLAF (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 07:00:05 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:54536 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755242AbeFYLAC (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 07:00:02 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8971529; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 04:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DEC9A3F73D; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 04:00:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Rutland To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: Peter Hurley , Mark Rutland Subject: [PATCHv2 01/11] atomic/tty: Fix up atomic abuse in ldsem Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:59:42 +0100 Message-Id: <20180625105952.3756-2-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20180625105952.3756-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> References: <20180625105952.3756-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Peter Zijlstra Mark found ldsem_cmpxchg() needed an (atomic_long_t *) cast to keep working after making the atomic_long interface type safe. Needing casts is bad form, which made me look at the code. There are no ld_semaphore::count users outside of these functions so there is no reason why it can not be an atomic_long_t in the first place, obviating the need for this cast. That also ensures the loads use atomic_long_read(), which implies (at least) READ_ONCE() in order to guarantee single-copy-atomic loads. When using atomic_long_try_cmpxchg() the ldsem_cmpxchg() wrapper gets very thin (the only difference is not changing *old on success, which most callers don't seem to care about). So rework the whole thing to use atomic_long_t and its accessors directly. While there, fixup all the horrible comment styles. Cc: Peter Hurley Reported-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland --- drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- include/linux/tty_ldisc.h | 4 +-- 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c index 37a91b3df980..0c98d88f795a 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c @@ -74,28 +74,6 @@ struct ldsem_waiter { struct task_struct *task; }; -static inline long ldsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct ld_semaphore *sem) -{ - return atomic_long_add_return(delta, (atomic_long_t *)&sem->count); -} - -/* - * ldsem_cmpxchg() updates @*old with the last-known sem->count value. - * Returns 1 if count was successfully changed; @*old will have @new value. - * Returns 0 if count was not changed; @*old will have most recent sem->count - */ -static inline int ldsem_cmpxchg(long *old, long new, struct ld_semaphore *sem) -{ - long tmp = atomic_long_cmpxchg(&sem->count, *old, new); - if (tmp == *old) { - *old = new; - return 1; - } else { - *old = tmp; - return 0; - } -} - /* * Initialize an ldsem: */ @@ -109,7 +87,7 @@ void __init_ldsem(struct ld_semaphore *sem, const char *name, debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)sem, sizeof(*sem)); lockdep_init_map(&sem->dep_map, name, key, 0); #endif - sem->count = LDSEM_UNLOCKED; + atomic_long_set(&sem->count, LDSEM_UNLOCKED); sem->wait_readers = 0; raw_spin_lock_init(&sem->wait_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sem->read_wait); @@ -122,16 +100,17 @@ static void __ldsem_wake_readers(struct ld_semaphore *sem) struct task_struct *tsk; long adjust, count; - /* Try to grant read locks to all readers on the read wait list. + /* + * Try to grant read locks to all readers on the read wait list. * Note the 'active part' of the count is incremented by * the number of readers before waking any processes up. */ adjust = sem->wait_readers * (LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS - LDSEM_WAIT_BIAS); - count = ldsem_atomic_update(adjust, sem); + count = atomic_long_add_return(adjust, &sem->count); do { if (count > 0) break; - if (ldsem_cmpxchg(&count, count - adjust, sem)) + if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(&sem->count, &count, count - adjust)) return; } while (1); @@ -148,14 +127,15 @@ static void __ldsem_wake_readers(struct ld_semaphore *sem) static inline int writer_trylock(struct ld_semaphore *sem) { - /* only wake this writer if the active part of the count can be + /* + * Only wake this writer if the active part of the count can be * transitioned from 0 -> 1 */ - long count = ldsem_atomic_update(LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS, sem); + long count = atomic_long_add_return(LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS, &sem->count); do { if ((count & LDSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS) return 1; - if (ldsem_cmpxchg(&count, count - LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS, sem)) + if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(&sem->count, &count, count - LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)) return 0; } while (1); } @@ -205,12 +185,16 @@ down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout) /* set up my own style of waitqueue */ raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); - /* Try to reverse the lock attempt but if the count has changed + /* + * Try to reverse the lock attempt but if the count has changed * so that reversing fails, check if there are are no waiters, - * and early-out if not */ + * and early-out if not + */ do { - if (ldsem_cmpxchg(&count, count + adjust, sem)) + if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(&sem->count, &count, count + adjust)) { + count += adjust; break; + } if (count > 0) { raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); return sem; @@ -243,12 +227,14 @@ down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout) __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); if (!timeout) { - /* lock timed out but check if this task was just + /* + * Lock timed out but check if this task was just * granted lock ownership - if so, pretend there - * was no timeout; otherwise, cleanup lock wait */ + * was no timeout; otherwise, cleanup lock wait. + */ raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); if (waiter.task) { - ldsem_atomic_update(-LDSEM_WAIT_BIAS, sem); + atomic_long_add_return(-LDSEM_WAIT_BIAS, &sem->count); list_del(&waiter.list); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); put_task_struct(waiter.task); @@ -273,11 +259,13 @@ down_write_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout) /* set up my own style of waitqueue */ raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); - /* Try to reverse the lock attempt but if the count has changed + /* + * Try to reverse the lock attempt but if the count has changed * so that reversing fails, check if the lock is now owned, - * and early-out if so */ + * and early-out if so. + */ do { - if (ldsem_cmpxchg(&count, count + adjust, sem)) + if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(&sem->count, &count, count + adjust)) break; if ((count & LDSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS) { raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); @@ -303,7 +291,7 @@ down_write_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout) } if (!locked) - ldsem_atomic_update(-LDSEM_WAIT_BIAS, sem); + atomic_long_add_return(-LDSEM_WAIT_BIAS, &sem->count); list_del(&waiter.list); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); @@ -324,7 +312,7 @@ static int __ldsem_down_read_nested(struct ld_semaphore *sem, lockdep_acquire_read(sem, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_); - count = ldsem_atomic_update(LDSEM_READ_BIAS, sem); + count = atomic_long_add_return(LDSEM_READ_BIAS, &sem->count); if (count <= 0) { lock_stat(sem, contended); if (!down_read_failed(sem, count, timeout)) { @@ -343,7 +331,7 @@ static int __ldsem_down_write_nested(struct ld_semaphore *sem, lockdep_acquire(sem, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_); - count = ldsem_atomic_update(LDSEM_WRITE_BIAS, sem); + count = atomic_long_add_return(LDSEM_WRITE_BIAS, &sem->count); if ((count & LDSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) != LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS) { lock_stat(sem, contended); if (!down_write_failed(sem, count, timeout)) { @@ -370,10 +358,10 @@ int __sched ldsem_down_read(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long timeout) */ int ldsem_down_read_trylock(struct ld_semaphore *sem) { - long count = sem->count; + long count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count); while (count >= 0) { - if (ldsem_cmpxchg(&count, count + LDSEM_READ_BIAS, sem)) { + if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(&sem->count, &count, count + LDSEM_READ_BIAS)) { lockdep_acquire_read(sem, 0, 1, _RET_IP_); lock_stat(sem, acquired); return 1; @@ -396,10 +384,10 @@ int __sched ldsem_down_write(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long timeout) */ int ldsem_down_write_trylock(struct ld_semaphore *sem) { - long count = sem->count; + long count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count); while ((count & LDSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0) { - if (ldsem_cmpxchg(&count, count + LDSEM_WRITE_BIAS, sem)) { + if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(&sem->count, &count, count + LDSEM_WRITE_BIAS)) { lockdep_acquire(sem, 0, 1, _RET_IP_); lock_stat(sem, acquired); return 1; @@ -417,7 +405,7 @@ void ldsem_up_read(struct ld_semaphore *sem) lockdep_release(sem, 1, _RET_IP_); - count = ldsem_atomic_update(-LDSEM_READ_BIAS, sem); + count = atomic_long_add_return(-LDSEM_READ_BIAS, &sem->count); if (count < 0 && (count & LDSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0) ldsem_wake(sem); } @@ -431,7 +419,7 @@ void ldsem_up_write(struct ld_semaphore *sem) lockdep_release(sem, 1, _RET_IP_); - count = ldsem_atomic_update(-LDSEM_WRITE_BIAS, sem); + count = atomic_long_add_return(-LDSEM_WRITE_BIAS, &sem->count); if (count < 0) ldsem_wake(sem); } diff --git a/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h b/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h index 1ef64d4ad887..840894ca3fc0 100644 --- a/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h +++ b/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h @@ -119,13 +119,13 @@ #include #include - +#include /* * the semaphore definition */ struct ld_semaphore { - long count; + atomic_long_t count; raw_spinlock_t wait_lock; unsigned int wait_readers; struct list_head read_wait; -- 2.11.0