Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263107AbTIJNdJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:33:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263100AbTIJNdJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:33:09 -0400 Received: from vega.digitel2002.hu ([213.163.0.181]:36331 "HELO lgb.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263112AbTIJNdH (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:33:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:33:04 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?B?R+Fib3IgTOlu4XJ0?= To: Luca Veraldi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Efficient IPC mechanism on Linux Message-ID: <20030910133304.GI28964@vega.digitel2002.hu> Reply-To: lgb@lgb.hu References: <20030909175821.GL16080@Synopsys.COM> <001d01c37703$8edc10e0$36af7450@wssupremo> <20030910064508.GA25795@Synopsys.COM> <015601c3777c$8c63b2e0$5aaf7450@wssupremo> <20030910115259.GA28632@Synopsys.COM> <03ae01c37795$063561a0$5aaf7450@wssupremo> <20030910121143.GA28858@Synopsys.COM> <03fb01c37797$33f706a0$5aaf7450@wssupremo> <20030910122810.GA28990@Synopsys.COM> <043901c37798$23be1520$5aaf7450@wssupremo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <043901c37798$23be1520$5aaf7450@wssupremo> X-Operating-System: vega Linux 2.6.0-test3 i686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1568 Lines: 31 On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:36:19PM +0200, Luca Veraldi wrote: > > but it does imply "tested". And widely used. And well-known. > > And inefficient, too. > Sorry, but I use theory not popular convention to judge. But theory is often far from practice ... Theory is something which uses some abstraction to "model" reality. Which often means oversimplification of the problem or simply the fact that a real case has got much more (probably hidden) parameters affecting the problem. Maybe these parameters are very hard to even detect at the FIRST sight. That's why most software development starting from theory _BUT_ some "REAL WORLD" benchmark/test should confirm the truth of that theory. Or even think about relativity theory by Einstein: the theory is good, but it's even better to prove it in the real life too: perturbation in the orbit of Mercury, or affect to the visible position of stars at an eclipse. That was the point when Einstein's theory bacome to be widely used by science. So I thing it's no use to start a flame thread here. Implement that IPC solution, and test it. If it becomes a good one, everybody will be happy with your work. If not, at least you've tried, and maybe you will also learn from it. Since Linux is open source, you have nothing to lose with your implementation. - G?bor (larta'H) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/