Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] ARM: davinci: da830-evm: use aemif platform driver
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
References: <20180625152920.11549-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
 <20180625152920.11549-7-brgl@bgdev.pl>
From:   David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Message-ID: <0e4bc2fb-15fc-6422-a4a3-0918adf0b1b3@lechnology.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:20:44 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180625152920.11549-7-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 06/25/2018 10:29 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> 
> We now support board files in the aemif driver. Register a platform
> device instead of using the handcrafted API in da830-evm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c
> index b2470141dba3..666db3cee08a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>   #include <linux/platform_data/mtd-davinci-aemif.h>
>   #include <linux/platform_data/spi-davinci.h>
>   #include <linux/platform_data/usb-davinci.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_data/ti-aemif.h>
>   #include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
>   
>   #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> @@ -333,14 +334,48 @@ static struct resource da830_evm_nand_resources[] = {
>   	},
>   };
>   
> -static struct platform_device da830_evm_nand_device = {
> -	.name		= "davinci_nand",
> -	.id		= 1,
> -	.dev		= {
> -		.platform_data	= &da830_evm_nand_pdata,
> +static struct platform_device da830_evm_aemif_devices[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name		= "davinci_nand",
> +		.id		= 1,

Actually, now that I've thought about it some more. It probably
makes more sense to make all of the "davinci_nand" devices in this
series use id = -1 since there is only one per board. It looks like
da850 is the only one that has a lookup for "davinic_nand.0" already.

I think that we are going to have to add clock lookups for the
"davinci_nand" devices as well. Although the driver doesn't do
clk_get() explicitly, I think some function it calls does get a
clock. I remember that we had to add a clock-ranges property to
device tree to get the davinci_nand driver working, which is why
I think we are going to need a clock lookup for these devices
as well.

> +		.dev		= {
> +			.platform_data	= &da830_evm_nand_pdata,
> +		},
> +		.num_resources	= ARRAY_SIZE(da830_evm_nand_resources),
> +		.resource	= da830_evm_nand_resources,
> +	},
> +};
> +