Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] x86/vdso: Move out the CPU number store
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc:     "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
References: <1529536506-26237-1-git-send-email-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
 <1529536506-26237-8-git-send-email-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806221714260.2402@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <80C1F514-1B4D-4CDC-BD46-6C3AA9601446@amacapital.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806221817280.2402@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <C9BB696F3A938947B10DCAD29FAB8FFA66BDB78B@CRSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <CALCETrU5yUFiY09yqzbZV3gYyMyqGPBPs2n31PRNkhyYZsNrgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806251739450.1821@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
From:   "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Message-ID: <e006b351-a2d7-e269-4e1f-d5ffa67d25d6@zytor.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:00:46 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806251739450.1821@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 06/25/18 08:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:02 AM Bae, Chang Seok
>> <chang.seok.bae@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Still setup_cpu_number() sucks.
>>>
>>> How about setup_cpu_and_node_number()?
>>
>> setup_fast_cpu_node_nr()?  setup_cpunr_regs()?  I don't have any
>> brilliant ideas.  Thomas?
> 
> It's really hard to find a good one. setup_cpu_node_cache() might work, but
> it's not brilliant either.
> 

Since this applies to the getcpu(2) system call (in addition to the
kernel usage), perhaps setup_getcpu()?

	-hpa