Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp4508510imm; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:36:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLOsyuIfFKO483K+Mj6JgHtc0uPFZmyzZ40bi1tdQQgnw/LtdckI2zFLn1xtQzpGttjdDM3 X-Received: by 2002:a62:4282:: with SMTP id h2-v6mr15046242pfd.242.1529973416440; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:36:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1529973416; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zoabd2/+DehqmBPbcRFHGkNLBEMicvJOIjcr78CcGMrUf9W/d6BsTV5gynzYOoOOsG yTmoN5HHtW/fG2lTIWLwa3e7pnu3YEjI85220FzFfS7Run5oDqV/0cDlhiwISN9S+a/1 HAmLerVU3mkotco0etTMPkotj3vmtPd46KLQ2Zlv+pFMirtoAGX8QrT/dQZDRuEuoNGD u8Q5IvQb1DY7BmjCSj3bxKp5QASZIaC9SBVyHNd4OEzt3RudMpPVYxx00vbaZ5RyPlbF JZIc9aPY3Z7ElVkQLQDVL5o6wG5Li9BwIijOcobYN7w2o54PJY+wKnLFRx6Pbm1fM8nj F1RQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=OvrnT+EnhqwoJckCV1KgV/NspvKN0ha5K+LceNuGZoU=; b=o6nLJxZytIzmWKfNqJ+pMlqNE6g+n1gQwBDdxkyMJOfHp3JZbQhiFPNMZ/ylYtoSYm Es7cV718RN3FhRtwPtMdh0nUAINxXFwMYtz++qrZTfpx9h+LQoM+HqzOjCgCBGL4aBxk uCx27Ooivqy319hpjYVMTOlml6QqnJGowfEAVWrBM1fKyzrxFxk2/OXwydAzPV3Oiadb 3z03kKQPrU3XUlLkrSCoKuBtj7uy78h1JUB0bFmVUumyi7+6UgFAG3/LufKSEgqncGQd Ykhbr9gtzxyh2CUEtepsnshKWOWxLmtEF+42HNSUtI0N8yPQmdVj3C77NRwaWDPwNz1Z r+Ew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b1-v6si225782plc.403.2018.06.25.17.36.41; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935063AbeFZAeR (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:34:17 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:36780 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755131AbeFZAdS (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:33:18 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w5Q0Sc4m048659 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:33:17 -0400 Received: from e14.ny.us.ibm.com (e14.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.204]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ju96qkch6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:33:17 -0400 Received: from localhost by e14.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:33:15 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.27) by e14.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.201) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:33:11 -0400 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w5Q0XA5P19071278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:33:10 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C88B2065; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:33:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2BBB206B; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:33:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.159]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:33:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 469CE16CA095; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:35:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, NeilBrown , "Paul E . McKenney" Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 26/27] rculist: Improve documentation for list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:35:12 -0700 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20180626003448.GA26209@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180626003448.GA26209@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18062600-0052-0000-0000-00000304097F X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009255; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01052336; UDB=6.00539469; IPR=6.00830262; MB=3.00021856; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-06-26 00:33:15 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18062600-0053-0000-0000-00005D23DD91 Message-Id: <20180626003513.27812-26-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-06-25_11:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1806260005 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: NeilBrown Unfortunately the patch for adding list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() wasn't the final patch after all review. It is functionally correct but the documentation was incomplete. This patch adds this missing documentation which includes an update to the documentation for list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() to match the documentation for the new list_for_each_entry_from_rcu(), and adds list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() and the already existing hlist_for_each_entry_from_rcu() to section 7 of whatisRCU.txt. Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 2 ++ include/linux/rculist.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt index 94288f1b8759..c2a7facf7ff9 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt @@ -820,11 +820,13 @@ RCU list traversal: list_next_rcu list_for_each_entry_rcu list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu + list_for_each_entry_from_rcu hlist_first_rcu hlist_next_rcu hlist_pprev_rcu hlist_for_each_entry_rcu hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh + hlist_for_each_entry_from_rcu hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh hlist_nulls_first_rcu diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h index 36df6ccbc874..4786c2235b98 100644 --- a/include/linux/rculist.h +++ b/include/linux/rculist.h @@ -396,7 +396,16 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, * @member: the name of the list_head within the struct. * * Continue to iterate over list of given type, continuing after - * the current position. + * the current position which must have been in the list when the RCU read + * lock was taken. + * This would typically require either that you obtained the node from a + * previous walk of the list in the same RCU read-side critical section, or + * that you held some sort of non-RCU reference (such as a reference count) + * to keep the node alive *and* in the list. + * + * This iterator is similar to list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() except + * this starts after the given position and that one starts at the given + * position. */ #define list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(pos, head, member) \ for (pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member); \ @@ -411,6 +420,14 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, * * Iterate over the tail of a list starting from a given position, * which must have been in the list when the RCU read lock was taken. + * This would typically require either that you obtained the node from a + * previous walk of the list in the same RCU read-side critical section, or + * that you held some sort of non-RCU reference (such as a reference count) + * to keep the node alive *and* in the list. + * + * This iterator is similar to list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() except + * this starts from the given position and that one starts from the position + * after the given position. */ #define list_for_each_entry_from_rcu(pos, head, member) \ for (; &(pos)->member != (head); \ -- 2.17.1