Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dcdbas: Add support for WSMT ACPI table
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>, Douglas_Warzecha@dell.com,
        Jared.Dominguez@dell.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>
References: <45b8bde6-aaa8-3f3f-0528-81e5e931751c@gmail.com>
 <bc6846e1-2b6d-dcc2-355c-2699aa1607a2@gmail.com>
 <CAHp75Vdmqm+r=Orxs6_dCr18y+EwEQ=s-7UgaZKHuKbtjMcOig@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180609010420.GA112645@localhost.localdomain>
 <CAHp75VcA5ZWahraDP69_hBHuqxw6cng93zAa1op5EBYfuCSPwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b59027b3-a48e-f168-5f12-c67758c0c2c7@gmail.com>
 <3b881313-d96c-0395-05f3-dd612b7e440f@gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VctDOupi9Vk+njzj3U5G8BthwnaNqE=Y8mOhJLviFkYbA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <32481fee-df4b-5af2-25f6-4d2dca487fbd@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 22:12:12 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VctDOupi9Vk+njzj3U5G8BthwnaNqE=Y8mOhJLviFkYbA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 6/14/2018 12:26 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If the WSMT ACPI table is present and indicates that a fixed communication
>> buffer should be used, use the firmware-specified buffer instead of
>> allocating a buffer in memory for communications between the dcdbas driver
>> and firmare.
> 
> Thanks for an update.
> 
> I answered to previous thread. The questions / comments are still
> applicable here.
> 

I answered your questions in the previous thread (a while back).

Please let me know if there are any more concerns with this.  Thanks!