Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265269AbTIJQcu (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:32:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265270AbTIJQct (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:32:49 -0400 Received: from fmr09.intel.com ([192.52.57.35]:48885 "EHLO hermes.hd.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265269AbTIJQcs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:32:48 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Subject: RE: BugReport: USB (ACPI), E100, SWSUSP problems (test5 vs. test3) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:32:31 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: BugReport: USB (ACPI), E100, SWSUSP problems (test5 vs. test3) Thread-Index: AcN3nZFUAbtFxDV4QHOLzZSG/H8Q5AAGrAoQ From: "Feldman, Scott" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2003 16:32:31.0425 (UTC) FILETIME=[21AE9310:01C377B9] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 731 Lines: 21 > - The e100 driver seems to be broken > The NIC is detected correctly and ifconfig shows eth0 as > usually. But for some reason not a single Byte seems to go over the NIC. The only change to e100 between test3 and test5 is: - kfree(dev); + free_netdev(dev); But that's only relevant when the driver is unloaded, so I would consider the drivers in test3 and test5 the same for your case. What are you doing with eth0 that worked for test3, but not for test5? -scott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/