Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <ff4c668d0807657940a4cddc6f7eb63d19be327c.camel@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a property in at24.c
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, alanx.chiang@intel.com
Cc:     linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, andy.yeh@intel.com,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        rajmohan.mani@intel.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 15:14:26 +0300
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Me-Tm8Q5_hGu2r1uqeYFAvCM9ssr7o=w1KZUyXcAn_uCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1529994128-26770-1-git-send-email-alanx.chiang@intel.com>
         <CAMRc=Me-Tm8Q5_hGu2r1uqeYFAvCM9ssr7o=w1KZUyXcAn_uCw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 09:41 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2018-06-26 8:22 GMT+02:00  <alanx.chiang@intel.com>:
> > From: "alanx.chiang" <alanx.chiang@intel.com>
> > 
> > In at24.c, it uses 8-bit addressing by default. In this patch,
> > add a property address-width that provides a flexible method to
> > pass the information to the driver.
> > 
> > alanx.chiang (2):
> >   dt-bindings: at24: Add address-width property
> >   eeprom: at24: Add support for address-width property
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt |  2 ++
> >  drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c                        | 16
> > ++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> > 
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> > 
> 
> What is your use case exactly? Do you have an EEPROM model that's not
> yet supported explicitly in the driver? Why would you need this
> option?

The current at24 driver has no address width support, thus, reusing same
(allocated) IDs (non-DT case) is hard.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy