Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp5129561imm; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 06:25:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLsfmwa39PcAsYONYIpVvXm3Zqc1R8xjxO5xEkmL/FckF0kvBD1+4CxLKRVFg+5V/70gg// X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:22e:: with SMTP id 43-v6mr1692261plc.82.1530019552347; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 06:25:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530019552; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WC9X677ICmYDTQZUtdiM9FiRJEpulrDSEJNBY9guGn4gukGK0XjZYToGVoNyENU+P1 nzp3JW6VmFur+/Q7MtVnG5AR6jU3kGOx7CXvxOej9DUzriFhuqe/NRN6p6s62MrarBAX ZSwibojUGkGp0z8VNuH7NcuFt5Ba33sM2d1ATycIEuBWo2J8SJiaemnJFgqPFOMav3Gq 3wFtIHmdhmBNZBBzQmJ3jsqjo/DIy/IsT96/C9VD/ykWIswv5DGtIBnAlm17GcwThuNI Dn/llA3WZYoWzB3winkYzfq2uaeKT+Rd5LwUAVv/06hfNTbhpRuvqoL09+mr55R3sF/u ptxA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:arc-authentication-results; bh=aumzwA/lgRD+GL/oZB2u647IVEN5GOBOoEviaUy1viY=; b=RGElCLKlJBr/R19LGFrog5pGCM7LxZhDpQLvKo3NfnNZiw5r59CwkRuqIi2AU9mJl7 nhcj0CzeQz0WeTv2yxskXOZYAmvTQSRTnlvnZ6GmtnFsZ81Ufw2oSHN6E7FHxdGv+jqV F8xwTTqxC97KcaQuiTIkzRiRqXNhbAbyS3q7848Pac1dgLR6ZYK4ykLcLIczyM09L8pL 5MPhdQF9tsVbIP7ewTM12+fB/62fzcdOQ1V4Qsgs/RWhLZQbpKF0H6STwaPTCS/9JGaX rmIcMRN/O6bIRWGO/iLQ8wAJ2/gTu0hfisBZugF9vLfzG0GMXc/zoe1MBPhLzN615Z3G 817Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s22-v6si1368047pgs.396.2018.06.26.06.25.37; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 06:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935762AbeFZNX3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:23:29 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:60744 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935341AbeFZNX1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:23:27 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jun 2018 06:23:26 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,274,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="53002158" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.72.86]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2018 06:23:23 -0700 Message-ID: <3a07d0d9fbe7178bbe9efa99fcb331df213a461f.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a property in at24.c From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: alanx.chiang@intel.com, linux-i2c , andy.yeh@intel.com, Sakari Ailus , rajmohan.mani@intel.com, Andy Shevchenko , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:23:22 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <1529994128-26770-1-git-send-email-alanx.chiang@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.1-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 14:36 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-06-26 14:14 GMT+02:00 Andy Shevchenko > : > > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 09:41 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > What is your use case exactly? Do you have an EEPROM model that's > > > not > > > yet supported explicitly in the driver? Why would you need this > > > option? > > > > The current at24 driver has no address width support, > > thus, reusing same > > (allocated) IDs (non-DT case) is hard. ^^^^^ > Every supported compatible has the width already specified in its > corresponding chip data. Please, read again carefully what I wrote before. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy