Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <72f02552-9375-bf81-6a03-42656168b583@gmail.com>
References: <1530100216-13070-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
 <c89b70f9-e70d-35a5-b9a7-7e3ed7d34edf@gmail.com> <CALOAHbCdRjq2n37GpeBdorcbxXMDX2vNDLftypViJd5hRTA28A@mail.gmail.com>
 <72f02552-9375-bf81-6a03-42656168b583@gmail.com>
From:   Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:38:02 +0800
Message-ID: <CALOAHbCRJWThE6oLH0m9ZV8xRMMCaZFM68eSGcm8awRbCLqOsw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: replace LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP with
 LINUX_MIB_TCPRMEMFULLDROP for drops due to receive buffer full
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/27/2018 08:14 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>
>> Got it!
>>
>> What about introduce a new counter, i.e. TCPRcvQFullDrop ?
>
> tcp_try_rmem_schedule() can fail for many different reasons,
> not related to how occupied the socket receive queue is.

Yes. So TCPRcvQDrop would be more specific ?

Thanks
Yafang