Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264231AbTIKCmy (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:42:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264419AbTIKCmy (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:42:54 -0400 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:14764 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264231AbTIKCmx (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:42:53 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Russell King Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] add kobject to struct module In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:32:47 +0100." <20030911003247.V30046@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:04:35 +1000 Message-Id: <20030911024252.B26352C04D@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1076 Lines: 26 In message <20030911003247.V30046@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> you write: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:24:21PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > A while ago we had talked about adding a kobject to struct module. By > > doing this we add support for module paramaters and other module info to > > be exported in sysfs. So here's a patch that does this that is against > > 2.6.0-test4 (it applies with some fuzz, sorry.) > > Please excuse my short-sightedness, but I think the following points > haven't been thought deeply enough: Well, obviously not publically enough, at least 8(. To clarify: this is for new-style module params, which explicitly control their own visibility with the perm arg. One more reason for module authors to switch 8) Hope that helps, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/