Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:39:06 +0200
From:   "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc:     "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] ipc: IPCMNI limit check for semmni
Message-ID: <20180628223906.GB331@wotan.suse.de>
References: <1529317698-16575-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
 <1529317698-16575-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1529317698-16575-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 06:28:15PM +0800, Waiman Long wrote:
> For SysV semaphores, the semmni value is the last part of the 4-element
> sem number array. To make semmni behave in a similar way to msgmni and
> shmmni, we can't directly use the _minmax handler. Instead, a special
> sem specific handler is added to check the last argument to make sure
> that it is limited to the [0, IPCMNI] range. An error will be returned
> if this is not the case.

Sorry my time has run out, and will be on vacation until July 10th. If
this can wait until then then great, otherwise hopefully Kees can take
a look. It would be wonderful to get Eric's review on this as well.

  Luis