Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 23DE8601EA
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To:     Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
Cc:     alagusankar@silex-india.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ath10k@lists.infradead.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: sdio: use same endpoint id for all packets in a bundle
References: <20180620084222.3521-1-niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
        <20180620084222.3521-2-niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
        <87zhzdersm.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87vaa1erlj.fsf@codeaurora.org>
        <20180629131141.GA26446@centauri.lan>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:51:51 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20180629131141.GA26446@centauri.lan> (Niklas Cassel's message of
        "Fri, 29 Jun 2018 15:11:41 +0200")
Message-ID: <87r2kpem4o.fsf@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:53:44PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:
>> 
>> > Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> writes:
>> >
>> >> All packets in a bundle should use the same endpoint id as the
>> >> first lookahead.
>> >>
>> >> This matches how things are done is ath6kl, however,
>> >> this patch can theoretically handle several bundles
>> >> in ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_process_packets().
>> >>
>> >> Without this patch we get lots of errors about invalid endpoint id:
>> >>
>> >> ath10k_sdio mmc2:0001:1: invalid endpoint in look-ahead: 224
>> >> ath10k_sdio mmc2:0001:1: failed to get pending recv messages: -12
>> >> ath10k_sdio mmc2:0001:1: failed to process pending SDIO interrupts: -12
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Alagu Sankar <alagusankar@silex-india.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
>> >
>> > You have Alagu's s-o-b first so that implies Alagu is the author. So
>> > should I add From header for Alagu and add you (Niklas) as
>> > Co-Developed-by? Or vice versa?
>
> Hello Kalle,
>
> It is not always obvious how the combination of git-author
> and Co-Developed-by should be:
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1801.2/00988.html

Yeah, that's true.

> Alagu deserves most credit, since I have simply taken parts
> of a very big patch and split it into smaller pieces.
> I tried to do the right thing by having his Signed-off-by first.
>
> Let's go with your suggestion and add a From: header with
> Alagu's email, and a Co-Developed-by tag with my email.
> (Note that both Signed-off-bys are still needed according to
> submitting-patches.rst)

Ok.

> Do you want me to resend the patches with these two lines
> added, or can you fix them up manually?

No need, I did that already in the pending branch. Please check:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=6b23bd067990df1cc1e9a4c28327393a7a3ba718

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=bf83a5c572e0737e59e026c989b190b4e52d2ef4

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=218f924d80b76520a4e60eead5e89f3ebd2e86c1

-- 
Kalle Valo