Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:11:30 -0500
From:   Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>,
        Hendrik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=FCckner?= 
        <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf test shell: make perf inet_pton test more
 portable
Message-Id: <20180629111130.fa4cc7d2bcd55e07a5298c1c@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180629152155.GB3593@kernel.org>
References: <20180619184952.dac6a3a1e39d3b1d255e7119@arm.com>
        <20180620134622.GM20477@kernel.org>
        <20180620194546.364cc109430ac51c5a288739@arm.com>
        <20180621141915.GS20477@kernel.org>
        <20180621151800.GU20477@kernel.org>
        <20180621153250.e29e7fbfbfe14b98341b68f0@arm.com>
        <20180629152155.GB3593@kernel.org>
Organization: Arm
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:21:55 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:

> Em Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 03:32:50PM -0500, Kim Phillips escreveu:
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:18:00 -0300
> > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Would be good if we had some utility that given a two files, one with
> > > regexps, could tell if, line by line, those expressions matched, better,
> > > one that is present in all these OSes...
> > 
> > I didn't find any, but given the two-file notion might be acceptable,
> > hopefully you might find the following more readable/acceptable?:
> 
> Looks better, you build the expected lines in a separate file, then read
> both it and the output, then do the matching, cleaner. And I assume it
> works with dash, right?

Yes, of course :)

I'll re-send via a new v2 series as 1/2 wasn't git-am friendly, and
I've uncovered another minor bashism.

Kim