Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp1200758imm; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:17:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpezcq6B11vGZLi7orB2NnocknSk1s+kx3k2ZUZYJiyEqydWRdS/dHJ0oDjNgsSJY72FBIuu X-Received: by 2002:a62:c8c2:: with SMTP id i63-v6mr10719pfk.73.1530303455577; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:17:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530303455; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wV6mDirb3jVtYgMdwz7wHCI7+02BsBMAfyGEU/9dLFGqzzpX6HUKkVyPDkkNyAh5M5 +wRjQHSViVd4tEHw/DSDT7mOCGhBqfd26DCn34N4l4L1oGl9/6gxaDTtexwjYAkyxBPM dLDkiuPr70I4GCRJfNn9gjXfSE5rWMrdvK06Dd1xGLj7toKlFuJSAtFhV+31CQLRPfSt RE0iiU71n07YBbn7j0SL2n1kHH9hLcTuTD9xo1iUdEOyKf2SX01KSFFAgJBj5pd0r8Rx xF/i5RMUfuG3v5r7A2Iw9Gfdp2yveIFOCU9uCu2v84SPmSunEQbM15hy7IR+MsUO2MBW fGVQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=kHflweU807kk3EfuuM6bVNEDIbeQUNw/8EbwmcecCaw=; b=eBHXS2ko9K+/RLwLIa1AG1XswOUvlLhalX8lBGVYOzFi8rMB/+WHNalcGaxNTrxGDZ lyameTsVkIzDa5wauz+bdn6c/6QhTWe4Zj2PcAEhrNXNT/dpKpCRZAJis6Snr+BGEvtj Nu+OG1cY2fCmpxNdEOL0OizmsiDNZAuJaUwvTvqnIbkHlXOdXjn+xZyqHh/lsJG/iOaH +tRXjxUqCWrbOsbcXzYtGqbZdeYFWOQc9NDufH9MqEipulzqjyxKWMSazpnEM85kcqll js4T/6GYjo8N8YPU4LweEVnQYvyT8CiB5DdRLdtiOYXX55MqWidSV39PV0WiefIqu1rH CIDA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b17-v6si3196744pgn.308.2018.06.29.13.17.21; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966304AbeF2S0H (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:26:07 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58526 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966039AbeF2S0E (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:26:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [65.196.126.174]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14916DB3; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 18:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:26:00 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Pavel Machek Cc: Linus Torvalds , alan@linux.intel.com, Johan Hovold , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Andreas Kemnade , Arnd Bergmann , "H . Nikolaus Schaller" , Marcel Holtmann , Sebastian Reichel , Tony Lindgren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] gnss: add new GNSS subsystem Message-ID: <20180629182600.GA17562@kroah.com> References: <20180601082259.17563-1-johan@kernel.org> <20180628120103.GA28131@kroah.com> <20180629094607.GC31718@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180629094607.GC31718@amd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Finally, note that documentation (including kerneldoc) remains to be > > > written, but hopefully this will not hinder review given that the > > > current interfaces are fairly self-describing. > > > > This all looks great. Thanks for doing this work and adding a new > > subsystem for something that has been asked for for many years. > > > > All now merged in my tree, nice job! > > I don't think discussion was finished on this one. It looked done to me as there was only a single set of patches, with no other working patches submitted from anyone else. If this turns out to be a "bad" api, then we can deal with it then, but for now let's try this out. thanks, greg k-h