Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp1402119imm; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 18:06:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLFuKjfjwVW6pBaA/3wGGGpbc+mN0fMdMHzj+6i2L98ISpRKH4ZJ8yOl5J/JNKyhUtiqw7k X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7446:: with SMTP id e6-v6mr17267822plt.161.1530320779499; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 18:06:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530320779; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QnIYugHbm3E518GtULq725jtH3O1xZlQLHJpLbvD6FFKXWeWQoZ2AsfPkofFK/pZkM hcRdSguNEaJ3QHQZg4lLWbtWcjwrDMuv1MIeJRvZLT/4TDWXZP/3lVBrCST4mfBBReXO FGg/tvuf1ZcTkKaMaBWYUMLansjC9+SNkDpyMMxH5I0bR95E+EdQDg6gmqFzVuyiHIwR 0zIdGL3slURle+qgGBmdwwkVOcC7s3I+Zi+2KlbsRsTMztvnG2nLS/C8n2+6XrVw4Ndi lQWGss+5nzWWblPPC9h8rXJzcxff3hXWcNVrGhsn86nY21wneZbjk+2bzl2snw1rjD8W UeaQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=+l9zhwNzpp23+5x2SnDesZj8Lx8EiIZp8GOBBsJJ/lg=; b=QlrQy5J8W8YJMpsfHFulvJFgp5sRI4/M0GjJc/bg3L6Xus+V3PPT7uqAWQ9IP/YLLg Mgc9bHNQOr8QJdyqyGkyeU2YfdSByIaFVPS4SbZpB17yyj/ySS58QeyEgHxpXobJ9iM/ kTgAorTT5xSM7qalVnSQm1IJGEWp+rqDkjQ8B7YV7NrNPOvlWtoCoh0Lk45jPUJQZ+M+ ZfG40fIPK6oGJTmlzxjuLb8xIDDsjXDWLsivkEj3c5zNyvIa3O5M8C7yr96qqahwo4Lw y/VgzYrblrTL0xerL2SlBW/duXBubF7hQw9ztm/PhvjT5cWcGGkpEU3/hcU5NMyeyjap mAUw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f3-v6si10267889pld.513.2018.06.29.18.06.05; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 18:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755277AbeF3A4p (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 29 Jun 2018 20:56:45 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:43402 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753435AbeF3A4m (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2018 20:56:42 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w5U0tXhb001343; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 19:55:34 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id w5U0tUKI001338; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 19:55:30 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 19:55:30 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Larry Finger , Randy Dunlap , Dave Hansen , Lai Jiangshan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Matthew Wilcox , Pekka Enberg , Jerome Glisse , Paul Mackerras , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Martin Schwidefsky , Andrey Ryabinin , Christoph Lameter , ppc-dev , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: [Update] Regression in 4.18 - 32-bit PowerPC crashes on boot - bisected to commit 1d40a5ea01d5 Message-ID: <20180630005530.GX16221@gate.crashing.org> References: <99169786-61dd-b19c-ac81-84bcd0a67de4@lwfinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:01:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 1:42 PM Larry Finger wrote: > But the real question is what the problem was the *first* time around. > I assume that has scrolled off the screen? This part: > > _exception_pkey+0x58/0x128 > ret_from_except_full+0x0/0x4 > --- interrupt: 700 at free_pgd_range+0x19c/0x30c > LR = free_pgd_range+0x19c/0x30c > free_pgtables+0xa/0xb > exit_mnap+0xf4/0x16c > mmput+0x64/0xf0 > > Does reverting that commit 1d40a5ea01d5 make everything work for you? > Because if so, judging by the deafening silence on this so far, I > think that's what we should do. > > That said, can some ppc person who knows the 32-bit ppc code and maybe > knows what that "interrupt: 700" means talk about that oddity in the > trace, please? 700 is "program interrupt"; here it probably means a BUG() happened (which does a trap instruction, which causes a 700). The stuff that scrolled away should tell more. Segher