Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp2487257imm; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 22:04:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpetv0l//iuXWr4TyJoBsVNaVL9SS0t9SzyYMCh8CD5XI5q8iOUx3uVhppqxt5kyFZXJw0M7 X-Received: by 2002:a62:6303:: with SMTP id x3-v6mr20582533pfb.91.1530421454159; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 22:04:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530421454; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TWBV0UuLAjy74n9sbqwJtl4k+QDBmqFNo8vd7mY99/IaLACg8BfiBResc/HapwcC0i D/C6qP7JBdr4CySvp+lnNX+72DqQNZVtLfrM4z+nEHOTEdIgArwY9MkVup2PfxaOi+J1 OAVM4gl9bTwM4GtP3dfZxwdmG2Cwi0+QGGJkbADIHmB30NR+0FfJWZKosEt7Tc68eXFu kqLugaOBeX0W4ewY29COc7mSod6/JZP7tCpour8y8ry0XKhDF+7U5lWypLlcC6Ei7K6G no9+65akkebkvs+gvItUEivrHuXeBAVfg5ZjJWQe2mRxJ3tXyHnA4gzgVPRxEjDiswzq 0Lug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=b8GzVeAruzEvCgjFCJA1WJXEhbHBNtwpyMLqcS3EVas=; b=XTxh3OyqMTLfg17fyyeFrR/IqMlv+/2ibQV3/fGUa6ddrNmcdgVopB29Kk1c2V3m+B GRzXgF+AEO09b8XezeBGQItOsNxG6frTT5Y4VQiN7LAWUr7R1LK7vmDLFImZmsitQRCh /GMGEDbLoI70sc3SAe6HI4yJhTNVilcGpNfhO76f0dMyFTyRXHORi6bLQx2p/u8pLVaY lIIJEbNZFhwexnUade7crwiPG0iRLNUK7uUXQd2ocMvq9QcgqH/hUOBQWux+/FTzPzPA 8RBTdjuY0pMlUT83wdfZxOho3RMEIqfqJrHRSQM/YXtTR5f7J5UQAgHHAy4bYavWUq9n rYyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 135-v6si13423180pfz.334.2018.06.30.22.03.59; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 22:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751877AbeGAFDX (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 1 Jul 2018 01:03:23 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:48739 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751136AbeGAFDV (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jul 2018 01:03:21 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Jun 2018 22:03:21 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,293,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="241698242" Received: from rchatre-s.jf.intel.com ([10.54.70.76]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2018 22:03:20 -0700 From: Reinette Chatre To: tglx@linutronix.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Reinette Chatre Subject: [PATCH 0/2] x86/intel_rdt: Fix cache pseudo-locking error path cleanup Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 22:03:01 -0700 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dear Maintainers, A bug exists in the error handling code during pseudo-lock region creation. When an error occurs early during pseudo-lock region creation the pseudo_lock_region struct is not cleaned up properly but remains associated with the resource group (since it remains in pseudo-locksetup mode). This partially initialized struct causes problems when other areas need to obtain resource group data - when partially initialized the resource group is treated as a pseudo-locked region. Following is an example of the error being encountered. First a pseudo-locked region of larger than 4MB is attempted. This fails early because of lack for support. Since this is not cleaned up properly, a subsequent attempt fails because it is (incorrectly) believed that a pseudo-locked region already exists, also the bit_usage file reports incorrect data. # mount -t resctrl resctrl /sys/fs/resctrl # cd /sys/fs/resctrl/ # mkdir p1 # echo 'L3:1=0xffff0' > schemata # echo pseudo-locksetup > p1/mode # echo 'L3:1=0xf' > p1/schemata -bash: echo: write error: Argument list too long # cat info/last_cmd_status requested region exceeds maximum size # echo 'L3:1=0x1' > p1/schemata -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument # cat info/last_cmd_status pseudo-locked region in hierarchy # cat info/L3/bit_usage 0=XXSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS;1=XXSSSSSSSSSSSSSSPPPP After the fixes in this series have been applied: # mount -t resctrl resctrl /sys/fs/resctrl/ # cd /sys/fs/resctrl/ # mkdir p1 # echo pseudo-locksetup > p1/mode # echo 'L3:1=0xffff0' > schemata # echo 'L3:1=0xf' > p1/schemata -bash: echo: write error: Argument list too long # cat info/last_cmd_status requested region exceeds maximum size # cat info/L3/bit_usage 0=XXSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS;1=XXSSSSSSSSSSSSSS0000 # echo 'L3:1=0x1' > p1/schemata # cat info/L3/bit_usage 0=XXSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS;1=XXSSSSSSSSSSSSSS000P Reinette Chatre (2): x86/intel_rdt: Move pseudo_lock_region_clear x86/intel_rdt: Fix cleanup of plr structure on error arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c | 68 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) -- 2.17.0