Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
To:     netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jian-Hong Pan <starnight@g.ncu.edu.tw>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>,
        Janus Piwek <jpiwek@arroweurope.com>,
        =?UTF-8?q?Michael=20R=C3=B6der?= <michael.roeder@avnet.eu>,
        Dollar Chen <dollar.chen@wtmec.com>,
        Ken Yu <ken.yu@rakwireless.com>,
        =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: [RFC net-next 03/15] net: lora: Add protocol numbers
Date:   Sun,  1 Jul 2018 13:07:52 +0200
Message-Id: <20180701110804.32415-4-afaerber@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20180701110804.32415-1-afaerber@suse.de>
References: <20180701110804.32415-1-afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Default protocol implementation will be datagram.
No other protocols are implemented yet.

Q: Would these protocol numbers be the suitable place to define LoRaWAN?

Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
---
 include/uapi/linux/lora.h | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/lora.h b/include/uapi/linux/lora.h
index 9368e8a84f3a..4ff00b9c3c20 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/lora.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/lora.h
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/socket.h>
 
+/* particular protocols of the protocol family PF_LORA */
+#define LORA_PROTO_DATAGRAM	0
+#define LORA_NPROTO		1
+
 struct sockaddr_lora {
 	__kernel_sa_family_t lora_family;
 	int lora_ifindex;
-- 
2.16.4