Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261305AbTIKRGb (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:06:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261391AbTIKRGb (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:06:31 -0400 Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:47505 "EHLO mail.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261305AbTIKRG3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:06:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:05:59 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: insecure@mail.od.ua, Michael Frank , Yann Droneaud , fruhwirth clemens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Subject: Re: nasm over gas? Message-ID: <20030911170559.GF29532@mail.jlokier.co.uk> References: <20030904104245.GA1823@leto2.endorphin.org> <200309052028.37367.insecure@mail.od.ua> <200309100034.58742.insecure@mail.od.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 592 Lines: 16 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Although I tend to still prefer gcc 2.95 for the code size. I just compiled a small C function with GCC 3.2.2. With -O2, it had two completely redundant stack adjustment instructions. With -Os, those instructions were gone and it was good code. Why, oh why is -O2 still so lame after all these years? :) -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/