Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@cisco.com>,
        Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.17 079/220] of: unittest: for strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field
Date:   Sun,  1 Jul 2018 18:21:43 +0200
Message-Id: <20180701160911.740952193@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180701160908.272447118@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180701160908.272447118@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@cisco.com>

commit 3b9cf7905fe3ab35ab437b5072c883e609d3498d upstream.

For strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field:

This is consistent with how dtc builds string properties.

Function __of_prop_dup() would misbehave on such properties as it duplicates
properties based on the property length field creating new string values
without trailing \0s.

Signed-off-by: Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Tested-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/of/unittest.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -165,20 +165,20 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(v
 	/* Add a new property - should pass*/
 	prop->name = "new-property";
 	prop->value = "new-property-data";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) == 0, "Adding a new property failed\n");
 
 	/* Try to add an existing property - should fail */
 	prop++;
 	prop->name = "new-property";
 	prop->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) != 0,
 		 "Adding an existing property should have failed\n");
 
 	/* Try to modify an existing property - should pass */
 	prop->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
 		 "Updating an existing property should have passed\n");
 
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(v
 	prop++;
 	prop->name = "modify-property";
 	prop->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
 		 "Updating a missing property should have passed\n");